Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Here's A Shocker...

Wealthy lawmakers increased their riches as economy sputtered in '09
The wealthiest members of Congress grew richer in 2009 even as the economy struggled to recover from a deep recession.

The 50 wealthiest lawmakers were worth almost $1.4 billion in 2009, about $85.1 million more than 12 months earlier, according to The Hill’s annual review of lawmakers’ financial disclosure forms.

Coming in at number one, for the second year in a row is John Kerry. Democrats outnumber Republicans by 4. One thing is for certain - party unity means nothing when it comes to getting a slice of the pork pie... It would be an interesting study to find out how many were rich going into their time in office (i.e. "bought" their seat a la Corzine) or how many became millionaires while in office...

In any case, it's interesting to see that the "party of the common man" has more millionaires than the party of big business...

That is all.

Thanks to PISSED for the link.

Prayers and Good Wishes, Please...

Mrs. Weerdbeard is going in for surgery today.

I've met Mrs. WB, and she's a really nice person. Even if I had never laid eyes on her, I'd know she's a saint just for putting up with Weerd - I spent 28 hours in a car with him from here to Charlotte and back and even that was pushing it... (I kid, I kid. Weerd is one of my favorite people).

Please, Dear G-d, watch out for Mrs. Weerdbeard and keep her safe in this time of need.

That is all.

MA: Saving Us from Ourselves One Thing At A Time...

Oh, Massachusetts, whatever would we do without your overbearing nanny state?

Bicycle Helmets: Why Adults Should Wear Them Too
BOSTON (WBZ) ―For Lisa Hoffman, strapping on a bike helmet has always been automatic.

It's a habit that saved her life.

"A rollerblader cut me off while biking. I braked really quick," Hoffman says "I flipped over my bike."
Well, then you're an idiot. Don't pass laws affecting me because you don't know how to properly stop a bicycle. The story here doesn't get into laws for adults, but still mentions that no states require adults to wear helmets (22 states mandate helmets for minors). This video here has the call for MA to mandate helmets.

Why stop there?

Why not full bubble wrap from birth to death? Maybe a protective cocoon we can all walk around wearing so that nothing bad ever happens, and if something does happen it's not our fault? At some point, the overbearing, overreaching government intrusion is going to mandate this sort of Nerf™ World; why not get in on the ground floor? Let's get a Nerf­™ Suit into production, get a bunch of idiots to make teary testimonials about how the Nerf­™ Suit ZOMG TOTALLY SAVED MAH LIFE, and agitate to have them made mandatory?

Gah. I probably just gave some Beacon Hill politician a boner just thinking about this...

That is all.

Rollin' Right Along...

...is the DGC, with the second addition of the week sent to me by SayUncle and Bob S.

Man says he killed mugger fleeing on bike in South Dallas
A Sachse man shot his alleged mugger to death in South Dallas early Friday morning, according to police records. Nicholas Lewis, 22, who lived on Cleveland Street, died in the hospital a few hours after he allegedly held up Jeffrey Hall, 43, in the 1800 block of Pennsylvania Avenue.

Lewis pointed a semiautomatic pistol at Hall and demanded his wallet, according to a police report. Hall told police he handed his wallet to Lewis, who started to ride away on a bicycle. But Lewis then turned, according to police, and fired at Hall – missing him and striking his pickup.
Unc pointed out the bias in the very title - the use of the word "fleeing" to prejudice the reader. If there's a hole in the truck, then it's pretty damn clear that Hall was under fire and therefore completely justified in using deadly force. Come to think about it, I'm pretty sure that under TX law he'd still have been justified even if he hadn't been shot at. It's a common fallacy that someone "fleeing" no longer poses a threat - as though someone willing to use the threat of deadly force is somehow incapable of turning and fire a shot as they leave.

Here, again, we have a story where the law-abiding citizen did everything the way the powers-that-be tell us to do them. He handed over his wallet. He complied with the mugger's demands. And he got shot at anyways. It's only the mugger's poor aim that spared his life, and who's to say what would have happened had he not been armed? Perhaps the mugger would have kept going. Or maybe he would have circled back to finish off his victim.

Fortunately, thanks to our armed citizen, we don't have to divine his intent, only inter his lifeless goblin corpse.

Dead Goblin Count: 61

That is all.

UPDATE: Unc informs me that the link has changed to remove "fleeing". I joked that it must mean that the awesome power of MArooned forced their hand...

The Drought Continues, Part II

As I've mentioned before, this has been an exceedingly thin year for new acquisitions. Tomorrow's the first day of September, and I'm still stuck on one new gun for 2010, the Ruger 10/22 I got as a late BAG Day acquisition in early May. It's not even a funding issue, given that the gun fund still had some ducats in it as a result of the 10/22 acquisition as opposed to a more expensive gun. Heck, I even got approval from the comptroller Mrs. for something new back when I was jonesin' for that 64 last month...

Since the last time I complained about the drought, several guns have come up for sale locally that I've had a passing interest in, a Dan Wesson model 14 with some cosmetic blemishes, an H&R M1 Garand with even more blemishes, a SA Micro-45, and a S&W Highway Patrolman among others. All excellent choices, all wonderful firearms, but none rising to the GOTTAHAVEIT level. There's one "gottahaveit" possibility, but the idiocy of MA handgun laws are making that seem less and less likely with each passing phone call - getting a handgun transferred from out of state is pretty damn difficult...

Part of it has to do with the rising cost of ammo. With .45 ACP running ~$20 for a box of 50 rounds, it gets expensive to go to the range for the afternoon and plink away with a 1911. Even 9mm is creeping up there, with a box of 50 rounds now selling for close to what the 100 round Winchester White Box was selling for not even 5 years ago. Hell, even the bulk Federal 550 round .22LR has more than doubled, going from under $9 to $19 in the past 5 years. And that's when you can find it - .380 ACP and .38 Special/.357 Magnum have all but appeared on milk cartons... It's hard to justify another mouth to feed when I can't afford to feed those I already have.

I'll readily admit to being as much of a collector as a shooter - I have numerous guns in the armory that have only been shot once since I got them (I won't buy a gun I can't shoot), all special in some way or another. I've got a Colt Detective Special with a 3" barrel, an H&R Sportsman 9-shot .22LR, a Yugo SKS with all matching numbers and import paperwork still intact, and a Colt Lawman Mark III that never seem to make it into the gun case on range day. I've shied away from several guns simply because I realize that I won't shoot them, and it's just not fair to let yet another gun languish in the safe. I'm also at the point where I've got enough guns in a certain caliber that I know another one is just going to wind up in the back (notable exception here: .45 ACP and 1911s. No such thing as too many).

One thing that I've started doing is getting my broken guns fixed. I've got my AK clone in for repairs now, with the Hi-Standard H-D Military .22LR next up for repair once that comes back. The Underwood M1 carbine is next up after that, and maybe even the Universal M1 carbine if I can pick up some .30 Carbine ammo at a reasonable price. There's a certain pleasure in rediscovering an old friend in the case of the Hi-Standard and the M1 carbines, and I'm looking forward to dressing up the AK with some new hardware. I've been toying with stocks and such for the 10/22 as well, adding the folding Butler Creek stock and swapping the fixed 4X scope for an unmagnified red dot sight.

But I keep plugging away on my quest for the next great addition to the armory...

That is all.

Monday, August 30, 2010

There's Nothing More Dangerous...

Than a politician with a crusade and no f**king clue.

Spark of danger

They look like toy cars, cellphones, fire extinguishers, Magic Markers, even doll accessories. One is a model of a Christmas tree, complete with flashing lights and holiday music, and another looks like a rubber ducky and quacks if you squeeze it.

But they are not toys; they are cigarette lighters. And soon they will be illegal in Massachusetts.

Yes, you read that correctly. MA is in the process of banning novelty lighters. Apparently all of the other societal, economical, and legislative problems have been solved in Massachusetts, and the state's lawmakers have free reign to turn their attention to the ridiculous. Once again we address the tool rather than the hand misusing the tool. Once again we ignore the elephant in the room - ignorance - and spin our wheels trying to hold back human nature. Once again we try our damnedest to avoid blaming a person and confer magic abilities on an inanimate object. IOW, it's MA being MA.

I doubt anyone wants kids dying in fires. You see, that's the flip side to this law - if you're against it, well, obviously you want to see little Jimmy burned to death because his mommy had a Santa Claus lighter. Now, a couple things here. I smoked for like 14 years. In all that time, I think I had maybe one or two "novelty" lighters, and they were shaped like guns* (go figure). Not once did a child rip the lighter out of my hands to go immolate their siblings. I'm curious what the percentages are here - how many fires are started by young kids (or at least claimed to be started by little kids)? I suspect you'll find that our legislators are drafting legislation that will address a very small portion of a very small percentage of fires.

Secondly, thirteen states already have laws like these on the books? Huh? I mean, yeah, CA/NY/IL I expect to have similar nanny state laws, but there's ten more? The article doesn't list the other states, but it sounds like this may not be limited to the bluest of the blue states - we're simply not safe from the ever-increasing intrusion of the nanny state camel's nose in our personal liberty tent. If state legislators have the time to dream up, draft, sponsor, and vote for idiotic "feel good" bills like this one that will accomplish nothing except to chink away at our freedom, then they need to go home.

Ideally covered in avian flight devices and polyaromatic hydrocarbon-based road surface material.

That is all.

*Side note: with the gun-shaped lighters, the flame almost always came out of the barrel, meaning that you would need to point the light right at your face to light your smoke. Not the brightest of ideas, but then again, neither is deliberately incinerating and inhaling carcinogens...

Um, What?

The Government Can Use GPS to Track Your Moves

Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway — and no reasonable expectation that the government isn't tracking your movements.

That is the bizarre — and scary — rule that now applies in California and eight other Western states. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers this vast jurisdiction, recently decided the government can monitor you in this way virtually anytime it wants — with no need for a search warrant.

Go to the link. I came across it here, and my first thought was that it was another alarmist screed from one of our anarcho-leaning libertarian brethren. Imagine my surprise when the link came up at Time.com - where the odds are better (slightly) that the story is legit. At first blush, it's hard to see how this could possibly be legal - government agents slipping onto private property to attach a tracking device, all without a warrant. It appears to be a violation of the fourth amendment at a bare minimum - unless you're the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, that is.

Alex Kozinski, long a favorite of the right, disagreed with the court's decision, but using an almost class warfare appeal:
Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who dissented from this month's decision refusing to reconsider the case, pointed out whose homes are not open to strangers: rich people's. The court's ruling, he said, means that people who protect their homes with electric gates, fences and security booths have a large protected zone of privacy around their homes. People who cannot afford such barriers have to put up with the government sneaking around at night.
Something tells me that he's arguing more from the equal protection standpoint than class warfare rhetoric, especially given his stance on other issues. It's an intriguing point he makes, though - it crystallizes what has long been held as conventional wisdom; that there are two sets of rules: one for the plebes, and one for the rich/powerful/famous. A ruling such as this one only reinforces that thinking - a rich person can afford measures to prevent this, such as gates, fences, and garages for all vehicles, whereas others cannot. If a ruling can be overcome by a simple application of wealth, how can it possibly be a good ruling?

In any case, it's refreshing to see the double standard brought to light and ridiculed, and it's good to know that there are still judges out there who believe in the Bill of Rights. It's hard to imagine this not being yet another ruling by the Ninth that gets thrown out; however the precedent set is positively chilling. That the agents involved in this mess were not summarily fired, fined, and ideally jailed for such a blatant abuse of power is frightening. Not unexpected, mind you, just frightening.

One wonders which of these "Two Americas" John Edwards falls into - I'd imagine he'd be all for any ruling that he could buy his way out of...

That is all.

Go Away for a Week...

...and the DGC suffers. Fortunately, I have my sources (thanks brad_in_ma!) sending me heartwarming stories of goblins achieving room temperature even when I'm away. Like this one:

Police: Judge Shot, Killed Intruder
Officials in Richmond County say a man who was shot after a break-in at the home of Superior Court Judge Carlisle Overstreet has died at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital.

Richmond County sheriff's Capt. Scott Peebles said Overstreet shot one of two men who broke into his home early Friday.
You know what that is? That's victim selection fail in action. Along with Darwin. I mean, first off, breaking into a home in GA isn't the brightest choice for starters - I think they're about as well-armed as Texans. Secondly, not doing a little homework to make sure that, oh, maybe your potential victim isn't affiliated with the criminal justice system? Sometimes stupid is fatal.

In any case, it adds to the count.

Dead Goblin Count: 60

That is all.

I Gotta Get One of These!

A guy wearing this T-shirt passed us on the drive home yesterday, and I laughed so hard I lost my breath for a moment:

(image courtesy of Seacoast Biker Gear)

Those of you who ride know just how damn true this shirt is...

That is all.

Cape Cod Vacation AAR...

Well, we've been back almost a full day, so it's time for the AAR for the big summer vacation. We took a week off and traveled to our favorite campground, Scusset Beach State Preservation in Sandwich, MA for a week's worth of pouring rain fun in the sun / rest & relaxation. I've been going to Scusset since I was a wee sprog myself, spending weeks at a time in our little class C (van front) camper as Dad fished on the canal and Mom basked in the sun on the beach.

One of the great things about Scusset is how little it has changed since I went there as a child - my folks sold their camper in 1982, and we took our son there in 2002 for his first trip and what shocked me was how little the place had changed. There had been some minor upgrades to the main office, and of course maintenance was performed, but by and large the campground hasn't changed since I was a boy.

There's still the same activities that I enjoyed as a boy:

Rock climbing

Those rocks comprise the jetty on the mainland side of the canal. There's a lighthouse (solar-powered, natch) that keeps the light lit, and a foghorn that sounds when visibility is poor. We heard the foghorn a lot Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. It was interesting - it's the very same sound that used to lull me to sleep as a young boy, sleeping in the area over the driving compartment in my parents' RV.

I couldn't resist a quick self-portrait to show that I really was on this trip:

What hams!

Of course we made it to the beach:

Diggin' holes

What is the fascination that digging holes in the sand holds for young children? When we first got to the beach, it was literally pockmarked with holes dug of every shape and depth. It looked like a bloodless version of the Normandy invasion there were so many holes to crawl into. There's just got to be some primal urge to dig in the sand (probably for food) ingrained deep in the psyche of man, and children are just more hardwired into that urge.

We took many bike rides on the canal:

Da girls

Da boy

TheBoy would like it known that this year, for the very first time, he accompanied Daddy all the way to the end of the canal for the very first time ever on the bike path. The mainland side runs from Scusset Campground all the way to Massachusetts Maritime Academy, a distance of approximately 7½ miles. TheBoy was astounded to learn that he had traveled some 15 miles on his bike, and delighted in informing everyone (and I do mean everyone) about his feat of physical prowess...

And lastly, there's fishing on the pier:

Fishin' spot

There's all kinds of fishing to be had on the canal: Flounder, stripers, bluefish, perch, and many other saltwater fish live in or travel through the canal, and rumor has it that you can even catch them. We wouldn't know from our travails, but to a nine year old boy, the thrill of even getting a hit on the line is better than landing a record-shattering catch - as long as he's the one doing the actual fishing.


Despite the poor weather at the onset of the trip (seriously, it rained for three days, which normally wouldn't be a big deal, except that it had not rained more than half a day all summer long) and the quick trip to the ER for the Mrs., we had a wonderful time. The kids got to run around and play on the beach; TheBoy got to stretch his cycling legs; Mrs. G. got some quiet time; and I got to have a blast with my family at one of my favorite places on the planet.

Until next year, Scusset Beach, when we meet again...

That is all.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Back...

More later. Much unpacking to do. Managed to avoid killing anyone on the drive home. Barely. NEWSFLASH: Large pickups towing 25' travel trailers don't have a stopping distance, we have a slowing distance. Just because you *can* fit your Civic in the space between me and the car in front of me doesn't mean you *should*...

On the other hand, we did make it home in one piece to find our home in one piece, so there are some good points...

That is all.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Last Day...

It's the last night of vacation. We're sitting in Friendly's enjoying the last ice cream of vacation (and most likely the summer). The kids start school on Wednesday, and with that starts the PTA/Cub Scout/soccer/etc. craziness that comes with the start of the school year. We're mostly ready, at least as ready as we get. Tomorrow we pack up and head home to a pile of mail and the old grind.

I miss the summer already.

That is all.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Friday, August 27, 2010

Quelle Difference...

Well, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday it rained. It got so cold Tuesday night that we turned the heat on in the camper. Today it's sunny, 80ºF, and just plain gorgeous outside. It's funny how your entire attitude can change simply because of the weather, but then again, when you're trapped in a small metal box with two hyperactive children, you go stir crazy a little sooner than most... In any case, the whole G. family is very happy the weather has taken a turn for the better.

Y'all have a good weekend - we'll be back in civilization in a couple days.

That is all.

Friday Fun Thread: Supercars!

PISSED sent me the following link that I thought was just perfect for a Friday Fun thread for cars:

World's Fastest Cars 2010

As Jeremy Clarkson from TopGear would say: These are the fastest cars . . .(long pause). . . in the world. Bugatti Veyron was dropped down to second place some time ago by SSC Ultimate Aero, but the engineers at Bugatti tought, this is unexceptable! So they made even faster and more powerful version of Veyron and now it is back to it's rightful place, at the pole position. It is still a close call between two leaders of this chart and you can expect the competition to go on.

World's fastest, currently in production and road legal cars are:
There aren't a lot of surprises (spoiler: The Bugattie Veyron is the fastest car, again), but what is very interesting to note is the criteria:
I drew the line at 220 mph (350 km/h) speed marker, because there is quite many cars that can do 300 to 345 km/h
220 MPH is the cutoff - meaning that any car that doesn't achieve 220 or better doesn't make the cut. As a street legal automobile... The biggest surprise for me, though, was the #2 slot - that's an American car in second place, not a million dollar supercar from European makers...

Okay, so there are some advantages to living in the modern age, I guess...

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #178

Today's gun pr0n is another fine firearm from Matt at SWR Manufacturing. The gun is actually the same model as one of the guns in the G. armory, but with a little something extra:

Very Quiet P226

That's a SigSauer P226 with an SWR suppressor on the threaded barrel right there. I wish I'd had more time to spend with Matt, because I'm really curious if either the LaserLyte RSL sights or the LaserMax guide rod laser would still function properly with the suppressor attached. It's not clear from picture of there's enough clearance for either (over the suppressor for the RSL or under for the LaserMax).

In any case, it's a very neat set-up, and a quiet one with subsonic 9mm...

That is all.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

If You Can't Say Something Nice...

A day of sorrow and nostalgia
ARLINGTON, Va. — A man wearing freshly ironed khaki pants and a blue blazer approached a hallowed patch of Arlington National Cemetery yesterday morning, bowing his head in prayer over a simple headstone marked with the name Edward Moore Kennedy.
Don't say anything at all.

That is all.

Don't Stick to These Guns...

In my request for blog post suggestions, Bubblehead Les had the following idea:
Top Ten WORST firearms you've ever owned? You know, something for the youngin's who are out shopping for their first gun.
Well, I decided to modify that somewhat, as I've only come across a couple of guns that I really didn't care for. However, there are definitely guns that new shooters should stay away from. They're not necessarily *bad* guns (in fact, I own quite a few...); they're just not the best firearms for someone new to shooting to add to their armory early in their shooting career...

*Airweight snubbie (like the Snubbie from Hell). Light weight to induce flinch? Check. Short sight radius to reduce accuracy. Check. They certainly have their place, true; however the movie gunnie would do well to avoid them until later in their shooting career.

*Pistol-gripped shotgun. Taking the stock off a pump-action shotgun may seem like a tactically sound idea - it reduces the overall length of the gun; makes it easier to wield in close quarters; and sure looks cool in the movies... In reality they're harder to control, punishing as all hell; and equally likely to cause you to break your nose trying to aim...

*Large bore Magnum handguns. Big bores have their place, but not in the armory of someone just starting out. Hand cannons are a good way to develop a flinch and/or deep-seated dislike of loud, insanely powerful weaponry. Or you could wind up a recoil whore like me and start thinking of ways to hot-rod the S&W 500 Magnum...

*Mil-surp firearms in oddball calibers. There's a reason that 6.5pm Carcanos sell so cheap - ammo runs about $2 a round and isn't exactly plentiful. While very few people love old guns as much as I do, it can be frustrating trying to find ammo for a gun that hasn't been made in over 50 years...

*Micro-semi autos. Following pretty much the same rationale as the Airweight revolvers, most of the micro-9s, 40s, and 45s can be quite the handful for even the seasoned gunnie. Expecting a noob shooter to get a grip on a 14 oz. micro-45 is just setting them up for sore mitts and a distrust of major calibers.

*Dino-hunting thumpers. You know who you are, the shoulder-breakin', chiropractor-needin' ultra recoil whores. The guys that think "calibers that start with '4' applies to rifles as well as handguns". 500 S&W Magnum is considered a plinkin' round to these guys. Well, these rifles do have their place (like subduing runaway dumptrucks), but for a new shooter they're just bad for your gunnie health (and your back. And shoulders. And arms.)

*Low-end guns. Sorry Weerd, but new shooters should definitely stay away from Cobras, FIE, Lorcins, and Jennings. These guns are fine if you know what to expect - not much - but for someone just starting to learn about "The gun thing", a POS that only goes BANG half the time - and stands a good chance of going KaBOOM - is not something for a novice gunnie.


So there's my list of guns for the new shooter to avoid. Some of them should be avoided by all gunnies; some should just be obtained after the gunnie in question has some experience under their belt. The last thing we need are more YouTube videos of some jackass handing his 100 lb. girlfriend a S&W 500 Magnum and laughing as it hits her in the forehead.

So, what other guns should new shooters avoid?

That is all.

Beginner Bikes...

Maureen asked an excellent question in my call for topics:
I'd like to have your opinion on good motorcycles for beginning bikers. I've been in *WANT* mode for a long time now, and still don't have the permit or plans to take the class, but I drool over every bike I see and would like to know both from you and your readers what your opinion is of a good "first" bike to think about. Maybe having a narrow list to choose from would be good motivation.
This is an excellent question, and one that is fraught with peril. What might be the perfect beginner bike for one person might be absolute screaming death on a stick for another person. I'm going to offer a few general guidelines and suggestions, but the real bottom line is to ride whatever you're comfortable riding. I've known folks that have started out on 500cc Kawasakis and 1500cc Hondas; guys who have never ridden a day in their lives getting a $35,000 Harley or a $50,000 show bike; and, most often resulting in the tragic or the hilarious, a teenaged boy getting a 1,000cc sportbike.

In general, there's three main types of bikes for the beginner: Sportbikes, cruisers, and standard motorcycles. Touring bikes are simply too large and unwieldy for someone just learning to ride; superbikes are too much temptation; and dual purpose bikes aren't set up for the novice rider in mind. All three categories have reliable, affordable offerings that are forgiving for new riders and can be found in a multitude of configurations. I'll discuss samples from each category shortly.

A few caveats to start, though. First off, take the Motorcycle Safety Foundation (MSF) Basic Rider Course. They're great instructors and offer classroom and saddle time instruction. Secondly, whatever style of motorcycle the new rider chooses, look for something relatively recent - in the entry-level market, even new bikes aren't terribly expensive and, as beginner bikes, can be very reasonable even 2-5 years old. The beginner is looking to gain experience riding a motorcycle, not spending hours turning a wrench on the weekend or waiting for their bike to be fixed. And lastly, most manufacturers hold "open house" events at their dealership where they offer demo rides - this is an invaluable way to try out a number of vehicles without plunking down the cash.

Sport bikes. A smaller (under 600cc) sport bike like the Kawasaki Ninja 500 offers nimble handling without being more than the novice rider can handle. Even 600cc bikes can quickly get away from new riders, and the racey styling and go-fast power and handling increase the likelihood of a new rider trying to out-ride their abilities. Sportbikes are generally pretty light, so they make slow-speed maneuvering such as backing out of a spot easier; the downside is that with the tight rake (how the fork is angled to the ground), turns need to be more precise than a low-slung cruise with a more open rake.

Cruisers. Because of differences in gearing and torque, cruisers like the Yamaha V-Star Classic with larger engines (up to 800CC) are often good choices for new riders. The cruiser often sits lower, allowing the new rider a more stable platform to learn to ride; they're balanced for more even cruising; and they are generally geared on the taller side for easier starts and lower cruising RPMs. Downside to getting a cruiser as your beginner bike is that they're generally more expensive than either other option; however of the three you're least likely to outgrow a 750cc cruiser too quickly.

Standard bike. The "standard" motorcycle, like the Honda Nighthawk 250, is the least expensive of the three options, often only costing as much as a scooter in the grand scheme of things. When I took the MSF Basic Rider Course, they had Nighthawk 250s (and Suzuki GN125s!) for the new riders, and the 'Hawk was eminently controllable. Standard motorcycles are currently out of favor, as companies churn out cruisers to match Harley Davidson or sport bikes to catch Ducati, but there's plenty of used 250 Nighthawks kicking around to pick up. These will be the least expensive bikes you'll find, but they will also be the ones you outgrow fastest.


One last thing re: "outgrowing" a beginner bike. This is one of the danger zones for the not-quite-so-new rider, when they start to get comfortable with riding and start to push the envelope on their beginner bike. I actually went backwards, starting off with a Yamaha 850 as my first bike and upgrading to a new(er) Honda Magna 750; the Yamaha was in rough shape when I bought it (hence why I recommend looking for something newer than 15 years old!) and I spent more time repairing than riding; the Honda I bought in excellent shape and rode from Day One.

After about four or five years, though, the 750cc engine wasn't really cutting it for me, and I noticed myself starting to "push" things - winding the motor up in each gear, leaning the bike over more and more in each turn, gunning the throttle too much from take-off. I was starting to outgrow my bike, having five years of riding experience under my belt most of which on the same bike. The Honda sat in the back of my garage for a few years, and then in 2003 I fell in love with the black beauty FLHT that I'm still happily riding.

When you feel yourself starting to get comfortable on a motorcycle it's a good thing; complacency, however, can kill.

That is all.

PS: Let me know what you end up getting - ideally with pics!

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

How's That Vacation Shaping Up?

For my last vacation, the April trip to Disney, staying on a workout schedule wasn't too big of an issue. Covering the vast Disney empire on foot ensures that one gets a pretty decent cardio workout, and even with the rich and calorie-intensive food they offer in the house of the Mouse, keeping the extra pounds at bay is fairly easy with all the walking. When we went down last year, the Mrs. was keeping a log of all her walking for a fitness goal, and had a pedometer on for our forays to the Magic Kingdom.

We walked at least five miles every day.

Needless to say, I made no effort to work out any more than that when we went to Disney. This trip isn't quite as intensive as Disney, although hardly lethargic. I'm bringing my running shoes and my bicycle - there's a 7½ mile access road along the canal that's closed to all vehicular traffic that is simply perfect for jogging or biking, and I've made it a point to start my day by biking the length of it or running a good chunk of it. It's an easy routine that means getting up about an hour before the rest of the family - simply because if I leave after the kids have woken up, I wind up with someone tagging along. As much as I love having my kids with me, they really cut into my peak heartrate time... :)

Exercising on vacation is often even easier than exercising at home. Most hotels have some sort of fitness center even if it is just a treadmill and a stationary bike, and a good number have indoor pools for a few laps. If your vacations take you to touristy places, there are often walking or self-guided tours of the attractions; obviously the usual caveats apply about walking alone in a foreign place and being aware of your surroundings. There are plenty of options available if you have the motivation to get out and get moving even on holiday.

There's no need to let keeping in shape stay back home with the answering machine and the local newspaper.

That is all.

Typical G. Family Vacation...

Let's see...

First off, it's been raining for three days straight... While we have a good sized trailer, two kids who normally only barely get along in a 4 bedroom house are just too darn close for comfort...

Second, we had a little mishap with the kitchen faucet being left on after our last trip and connecting the city water. Let's just leave it that water gets everywhere when it pours out of the sink for several minutes...

And now we're having breakfast in Friendly's down the street from the hospital where Mrs. G. is getting checked out for a particularly stubborn infection. It's been hanging on for a few weeks now, and of course decides that on vacation is the perfect time to start spreading...

IOW, par for the course for our family vacation...

That is all.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Gunnie Gifts...

Greg from West by God had an interesting suggestion:
I've got a great idea... "what firearms an overpaid contractor in Iraq should acquire upon coming home from a year in the desert."

Heh. I only have 7 months left to plan.
Well, while his is pretty specific, I broadened it to mean, "Jay, what would you recommend someone get as a firearm for a special occasion/gift/'OMG I Survived Don't Ever Do That Again' Present?"

Now, obviously, there are about as many answers to this question as there are gunnies out there. Some would choose a high-end target pistol; others an insanely ornate over-under shotgun; still others would opt for a match-quality AR-15 variant. Any one of these would be a fantastic idea, subject only to the whim of the buyer. I guess for the sake of this exercise, there's a few qualifiers we'll toss in before we get going...

1. We'll assume that the buyer in question has a fundamental grasp of firearms and their function and as such is not constrained by being unfamiliar with 1911s, AR-15s, or short-barreled revolvers.
2. We'll assume that the expenditure is going to be sizable but not unlimited; otherwise the list would be filled with full auto goodness or H&H double rifles.
3. The firearm to be acquired should be extravagant yet functional - no safe queens or collector holy grails need apply.
4. Lastly, the buyer does not have any gaping holes in their armory that should be filled first - long range rifle, home defense shotgun, intermediate power carbine, etc. are covered by the existing armory already.

With those caveats in place, here are some ideas I have for how Greg can spend his hard-earned ducats (and please Beth, don't kill me...)

1. High(er) end 1911 target pistol. Les Baer, Ed Brown, S&W Performance Center, Kimber Gold Match, etc. Now, granted, it would be easy to drop the equivalent of a nice used car on a custom 1911, but picking up a higher end gun for under two large should be achievable.

2. Long range bolt action. Much like the high end 1911, this is another one of those open-ended quests where one could easily spend the GDP of several small nations on a rifle and glass. Something in .308 Win or larger with a scope capable of 300+ yard resolution would fit the bill nicely. Extra points for heavy barrel and bipod. Try to avoid anything with "tactical" in the name.

3. Two words: Colt Python. They're rare and getting rarer, but examples in excellent condition can still be found for under $2K. Find one of the older models with the rich, deep bluing, or one of the nickel versions. 6" barrel is a must.

4. Match grade AR-15 variant. Something with a 20" - 24" stainless heavy barrel, flattop upper for optics, and competition stock with cheek rest. Something that'll shoot rings around the typical Fudd rifle just for kicks...

5. Obsolete/rare milsurp. I'm thinking something in the SVT-40 or FN-49 family. Take home something with an exotic pedigree and not get in trouble with the Missus!


So there's my list of potential acquisitions. I'm sure there are many other options I haven't covered, but I was trying to offer a broad spectrum of choices. Each item on this list is something I'd like to get someday, but are either duplicates/improvements of existing guns or else so impractical that spending the money just isn't an option. In Greg's case, he's earned himself something pricey and/or impractical.

What would you recommend he get?

That is all.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Invasion of the iBody Snatchers...

I was getting ready for vacation Sunday night, charging my various and sundry electronic devices and making sure I had all my chargers and batteries and such ready to be brought into the camper when I looked down and saw this:

Holy iGear, Batman!

And I realized something: I am turning into Alan!

That is all.

A is for Asperger's, B is for Billing...

My blogfather Ricky asked the following question a couple times, as he was curious to get my take on the matter:
I'd love to see your opinion on the new law in Mass. that makes insurance companies include autism in their coverage. Your *honest* opinion, not what you'd think your old buddy would like to hear. :)
(Link added for emphasis)

I guess I just don't know enough about the whole debate or something, but I was surprised to hear that this was even news. More precisely, I'm stunned that autism treatments weren't already covered. TheBoy has a friend with Asperger's Syndrome (which I understand is different than autism, but certainly analogous), and while it's not a life-threatening disease, it's certainly something that can't be fixed with two aspirin and a call in the morning.

As far as I can tell, the primary treatments available for autism are behavioral in focus; I imagine this is where the main thrust of opposition comes in. We've got almost a hard-wired opposition to mental health problems it seems; anyone incapable of "shaking it off" or "suck[ing] up and deal[ing]" with their problems is viewed with suspicion or hostility for some perceived imperfection. Some of the opposition, possibly, stems from those who game the system - claiming mental illness where not exists - but other than that it's pretty mystifying that an alcoholic who decides to finally shake the monkey is lauded, whereas someone suffering from a behavioral anomaly who needs therapy is viewed with suspicion.

From a financial/conservative standpoint, if treatments are covered for other, similar issues, then it's a no-brainer. If one's health insurance will cover physical therapy after an accident, or speech therapy for the recipient of sugery to repair a cleft palate, then it should cover the physical therapies needed for someone with autism. If insurance will cover behavior modification therapy - like stop-smoking clinics or OCD - then it should cover treatment for autism as well. Perhaps I'm oversimplifying or missing some other critical part here, but it seems that omitting autism from insurance coverage has (had) no basis in medical fact.

Ricky, feel free to correct me if I'm grossly misrepresenting the issue or missing the point.

That is all.

Don't Get "Clip"d

Mopar had an intriguing suggestion for a post this week:
That whole MA mag capacity ban/preban thing still has me scratching my head.
Welcome to the club, Mopar. It's just as confusing for those of us who live here. Put on your wayback hats to 2004. George Bush was facing John F. Kerry for the presidency; the GOP was hanging on to their 10-year lead in the House and recent lead in the Senate. A landmark gun control bill was coming up for sunset, and there was very little impetus to extend it beyond the September 2004 date.

Except, of course, in various and sundry anti-gun enclaves around the country. Like Massachusetts.

Mitt Romney signed a permanent ban on so-called "Assault Weapons" in 2004 that mirrored the expiring Federal ban. The law provided little other than a vague definition:

Section 131M. No person shall sell, offer for sale, transfer or possess an assault weapon or a large capacity feeding device that was not otherwise lawfully possessed on September 13, 1994. Whoever not being licensed under the provisions of section 122 violates the provisions of this section shall be punished, for a first offense, by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than ten years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and for a second offense, by a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $15,000 or by imprisonment for not less than five years nor more than 15 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

So, the definition of an "assault weapon" boils down to the federal definition set forth in 1994:

      (b) DEFINITION OF SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPON- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

      `(30) The term `semiautomatic assault weapon' means--

        `(A) any of the firearms, or copies or duplicates of the firearms in any caliber, known as--

          `(i) Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (all models);

          `(ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil;

          `(iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC-70);

          `(iv) Colt AR-15;

          `(v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, and FNC;

          `(vi) SWD M-10, M-11, M-11/9, and M-12;

          `(vii) Steyr AUG;

          `(viii) INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9 and TEC-22; and

          `(ix) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12;

        `(B) a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of--

          `(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

          `(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;

          `(iii) a bayonet mount;

          `(iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and

          `(v) a grenade launcher;

        `(C) a semiautomatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of--

          `(i) an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

          `(ii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;

          `(iii) a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned;

          `(iv) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and

          `(v) a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm; and

        `(D) a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least 2 of--

          `(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

          `(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;

          `(iii) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 5 rounds; and

          `(iv) an ability to accept a detachable magazine.'.
    Figuring out which firearms are and are not legal to own in MA is pretty easy (albeit stupid). Figuring out which magazines are and are not legal to own in MA is much harder. Let's start off with the easy parts:

    1. Anything with a capacity of 10 rounds or less is fine;
    2. Anything with a "Law Enforcement Only" stamp is not fine;
    3. Anything over 10 rounds that did not exist prior to 1994 is not fine (i.e. S&W M&P normal capacity magazines).

    Anything outside of these parameters gets significantly more difficult. Take Glock, for example. The magazines they manufactured in 2005 look very similar to those manufactured in 1993. SigArms mags are very much the same. Ditto aftermarket magazines for the Ruger 10/22. There's probably hundreds of thousands of magazines available for AR-15 and AK-47 based rifles that fall into the "pre-ban" category by several decades; heck, rifles like the M1 carbine haven't had magazines made since well before the ban (not USGI at least).

    To the best of my knowledge, no one in MA has been prosecuted for having a post-ban magazine. It would be a rather difficult position for a DA to push, given that finding the "born on" date for a magazine without a serial number is nigh-unto impossible. I still choose to err on the side of caution, only buying magazines with capacities exceeding 10 rounds from folks I trust and covering my posterior wherever possible. My "pre-ban" magazines certainly look like they were made over 16 years ago - there's a world of difference simply in appearance between my new 10 round Hi-Power magazine and the 65 year old 13 rounder that came with it.

    That's the rub. That a magazine, a simple construct of metal (or metal and plastic) could result in me losing my freedom - and my right to own firearms for the rest of my life - is simply unconscionable. In the case of certain Smith & Wesson and Beretta .40 S&W autoloaders, the magic number is as low as 1 - full capacity magazines hold 11 rounds. In Massachusetts (and other states that retain the Federal AWB specs), that one round means the difference between a legal magazine and a felony.

    In what world does that make any sense to anyone with more than two or three functioning brain cells?

    That is all.

    Monday, August 23, 2010

    I Love the Modern Age...

    I'm sitting in McDonald's in a rest area waiting for BabyGirl G. to finish her lunch (go figure) and dragged out the Eee to do a little surfing before we get to the campground. We went a combination of old school and new media - Mrs. G picked up a bunch of tourist brochures, and I hit the web to get some addresses and directions to tourist attractions that we might be interested in. Because we're camping, it is raining for three days straight, the first significant rain we've had all summer...

    Oh well, it'll give me a chance to read "Unintended Consequences" (thanks PISSED!).

    That is all.

    Fascinating!

    Looking Out: Nazis On The Harbor
    Henry Kolm had an interesting job as a 21-year-old.

    He smuggled Nazi scientists into Boston Harbor.

    He’d meet most of them off Nixes Mate, the smallest of the Harbor Islands — no more than gravel shoals — where a beacon warns ships coming into the harbor. Then, he and a Boston whaler captain named Corky would scoot them out to Long Island and a secret hotel fashioned from the barracks of the old Civil War derelict known as Fort Strong.
    The article's really about Project Paperclip, the post-WWII/pre-Cold War project to bring Nazi scientists to America to aid in our propulsion efforts. The "star" of Paperclip was none other than the father of the V2, Werner von Braun, and his trials and tribulations after the end of WWII, where he was brought to the US to help us in the Cold War. It's a truly fascinating story, with cloak-and-dagger type stuff mixed in with the truly geekarific.

    Plus it gives me a reason to post this:



    I don't care who you are, that's cool right there...

    That is all.

    Going to the Cape...

    We'll be leaving shortly to take our annual pilgrimage to Cape Cod for a week's worth of R&R. This is "my" vacation - Mrs. G. likes vacations like Disney, where every second of the day is filled with something to do, someplace to be, some force driving you onward. Every moment is planned; every day has some central activity in which to participate; every meal is thought out in advance (whether making reservations or gathering supplies). My vacations are more the type where you forget what day it is, mainly because you left your watch at home and have done nothing but lounge on the beach drinking frosty malt beverages all day long...

    We did Disney over the kids' April vacation. This week we're going to the Cape...

    I've been going to the same campground on Cape Cod (technically, the campground - state preservation, to be precise - is on the mainland side of the canal) since I was about 5 or 6. My folks had a little (19') Class C camper (the ones with the van-front), and every year we'd spend 2-4 weeks on the Cape during the summer. Mom loved it because she could walk to the beach every day. Dad loved it because he could fish off the canal every day. My sister and I loved it because we were allowed to ride our bikes pretty much everywhere in the campground - and because there's an 8 mile long access road that runs right past McDonald's *and* Friendly's, we could - at the tender age of 10 - go get greasy burgers or ice cream all by ourselves.

    One of the neat things about the campground is how little it has changed in the 30+ years I've been going there. Aside from a facelift to the Visitor's center, it's more or less unchanged from the 1970s (or longer; I've only been going there since the Carter administration). Six men have sat in the Oval Office in the time I've gone to the campground; we're lost two space shuttles and the twin towers in NYC as well. I've gone from a child to a man with children of my own; I've been bringing my son to the same campground since he was a baby. It's the camping equivalent of "comfort food", a single unwavering constant in a swirling sea of change.

    So we're off, once again, to drive down to the Cape, braving crazy traffic and all to make our way to our campsite. It's supposed to be on the wet side Monday (is there any other kind of weather to set up a campsite in?), but the remainder of the week looks passable. The kids are all kinds of excited - they can't wait to fly kites, build sandcastles on the beach, and fish off the pier. I can't wait for some quality family time that doesn't involve rushing off to one appointment/commitment after another - or giant singing rodents...

    I've got a handful of posts prepped to go each day, and should be popping in on rare occasion (the local convenience store has both beer and free wifi - what a country!). Don't let the country go to hell while I'm gone (at least, not any more so than Øbama and his merry band of socialists have tried thus far); be sure to check out the fine folks over on the right in the blogroll; and be sure to punch at least one hippie a day.

    I'll be back with HATERAGE and gun pr0n before you know it.

    That is all.

    MArooned Product Review: Dragon Leatherworks "FlatJack"

    I mentioned last week that Dennis from Dragon Leatherworks had sent me another holster to try out. In a nutshell, I felt that he needed to branch out into wheelguns in his holstermaking, and the J-frame was as good a place as any to start. He got me the holster, but forgot something: The name. The reason the holster name is in quotations is because it's not official yet. Dennis e-mails me the following:
    BTW...the new holster has no name. I have pictures, but can't think of a name that doesn't sound dopey. I tried *flapjack* (a play on being a pancake holster), J-cake, Comet (was that an old Ford?), Snakebite, ...but none of them grabbed me.

    Give it a name Brother...seeing that you have #1, and you provided the model for it, you earned naming rights for this one. :-)
    I mulled it over, trying desperately to come up with something clever that would fit in with the DL Classic and the Fugly, as well as being evocative of function, IMHO. Then I put it on, and the name jumped out at me: FlatJack (like it? Hate it? Got a better name? Let me - and Dennis - know!). It's a play on the type (pancake) with a tip 'o' the hat to the functionality.

    I've got another pancake holster, a nice Galco for my SW99. I like how the pancake style holds the holster close against the body so that it can be easily concealed by a nondescript cover garment (IOW, you don't need a parka to hide it). This holster positively shines in that aspect:

    Nice and Flat

    I carried the Snubbie from Hell™ (Dennis is now curled up in the fetal position at this point) all weekend in this rig, covering it with a denim shirt, a Hawaiian shirt, and an XL polo shirt. The holster works very well - it sits perfect, carries the gun in just the right spot, is adjustable for a wide variety of carry positions (3 o'clock, 4 o'clock, 5 o'clock, etc.); it just plain works. Drawing is smooth and uncomplicated, and the thick leather holds the holster open for easy re-holstering (yes, I am writing my blog post as we speak...) It's a high quality holster offered at a very reasonable price by someone who understands what gunnies need and is eager and willing to work with the 2A community.

    I think this might just be the runaway hit of the summer! As we say here in MA, looks like a winnah!

    That is all.

    Sunday, August 22, 2010

    Tres Cool...

    Patrick over at Where Angels Fear to Tread sent me the following link:

    SAR 1911 TDT (Take Down Tool) fast work in progress

    It details the creation of a custom folding knife from start to finish, resulting in this glorious bit of work here.

    Check it out - it's a fascinating read!

    That is all.

    Shudder...

    PISSED, not being content with sending me stories that raise my blood pressure, has turned his attention to making me physically ill. I open my inbox yesterday to discover this nausea-inducing story:

    The men with the golden guns: Mexican museum displays 'narco bling' weaponry confiscated from drug lords
    This gleaming display of weaponry reveals the increasingly extravagant lifestyles of Mexican drug barons.

    The confiscated items, which include several guns and high-precision rifles lavishly decorated with gold, jewels and even religious symbols, feature in a Mexican military museum.

    The first picture is a Colt 1911 with gold inlays, accents, engraving, etc. It's too garish for words, and I'm certainly as hell not gonna sear your retinas with it's hideosity. If you haven't eaten yet today, or have a morbid curiosity for things that will make you violently ill, go check out some of the pimped-out guns.

    It's enough to make a gunnie cry, it is.

    That is all.

    Saturday, August 21, 2010

    That's My Boy...

    TheBoy just got a new toy, a remote-controlled airplane that's designed to be flown indoors. It has a foam body and light foam wings connected to the fuselage by magnets, with the idea that if it hits something, the wings pop off rather than break. So he's flying it in the house, learning how to modulate the power to the little propeller to maximize air time, and he flies it into the corner of the hallway/foyer wall, where it breaks apart and plummets to the floor. Out of his mouth I hear,
    "Dad, did you see that? EPIC FAIL".
    Heh.

    That is all.

    Saturday Silly...

    Seen in Gunblogger Conspiracy chat posted by TheUnpaidBill:

    That is so cool I may have to try it...

    That is all.

    Saturday Circle...

    Vicious Circle #64 is up for your listening pleasure.

    Strap in, this one's another long 'um (well over four hours) as alan, Kevin and Tracie (Mrs. Whitebread in her first VC appearance) and I discuss the AZ border (and that infuriating sign), the November elections, hating both political parties, '80s nostalgia, police brutality, racism, things that are not in the Constitution, and, my favorite, the new Gadsden flag (which I like so much I am considering having done in ink...)

    Vicious Circle: Now bringin' the big brains.

    That is all.

    Friday, August 20, 2010

    Definitely the Wrong Day...

    Today we have an unprecedented double rage day...

    (image courtesy of Robb Allen)

    Daniel Rubin: An infuriating search at Philadelphia International Airport
    At what point does an airport search step over the line?

    How about when they start going through your checks, and the police call your husband, suspicious you were clearing out the bank account?

    That's the complaint leveled by Kathy Parker, a 43-year-old Elkton, Md., woman, who was flying out of Philadelphia International Airport on Aug. 8.

    Read the whole article. Apparently the TSA took it upon themselves to play detective and snoop around inside Mrs. Parker's purse. Alarmed by the checks they found, they accused her of cleaning out her joint bank account with her husband and fleeing - going so far as to call her husband about it.

    Someone please fill me in where this fits in with airport/airplane security? Last time I checked, TSA was supposed to make sure we weren't bringing items on board the airplane that could cause harm to other passengers or damage the aircraft. They weren't little Dick Tracy's discerning someone's intent from the contents of their purses...

    And folks wonder why we drive everywhere...

    That is all.

    Friday Fun Thread: Rowr...

    Today's Friday Car Fun Thread comes to us courtesy of The World's Most Dangerous Librarian, who was kind enough to send this link about 11 Cars That Look Like Animals (PHOTOS).

    I suspect that Myra may have played a role in this selection:

    (pic from link)

    Yep. Cars that look like animals. I'm surprised the truck from "Dumb and Dumber" didn't make the cut, although I suppose movie cars are out for this list. It appears to be a compilation of wacky vehicles that folks have made to resemble their favorite animal. I've never understood the whole "automobile as canvas" concept, whether it be gluing seashells or trinkets to one's wagon, painting a van in psychedelic colors, or slapping a 3' tall spoiler on a small four door sedan.

    I've always viewed the car itself as art, from the swooping, graceful lines of the Cadillacs of the 1920s and 30s to the utilitarian goodness of the original GP to the current incarnations of people carriers. Folks have devoted their entire lives and careers to making cars beautiful, and sometimes they succeed, and sometimes they fail. Countless fortunes have been won by an aesthetically stunning car, others have been lost to cars that failed to capture the attention of the American motoring public. Entire cottage industries have evolved catering to our desire to personalize our rides, with everything from chrome accents to full body kits available so you can play dress up with your Chevrolet.

    It may not be an American exclusive, the festooning of our cars with extra stuff not from the factory, but I think we're the most diverse about it...

    That is all.

    Guess I Picked the Wrong Day to Quit Sniffin' Glue...

    (image courtesy of Robb Allen)


    9th Circuit Strikes Down Ban on Military-Medal Lies, Cites Crush Video Opinion
    A federal appeals court is citing the First Amendment in an opinion striking down a law barring lies about military honors or decorations.

    The 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tossed the prosecution of a California man, Xavier Alvarez, who falsely claimed that he had won the Congressional Medal of Honor, Politico reports.

    “We have no doubt that society would be better off if Alvarez would stop spreading worthless, ridiculous, and offensive untruths,” the opinion (PDF) said. “But, given our historical skepticism of permitting the government to police the line between truth and falsity, and between valuable speech and drivel, we presumptively protect all speech.”

    Okay. I will readily admit to not being a legal scholar, and as such may have missed some level of nuance here. But did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals really just rule that the government can't make laws against fraud and lies? Are we about to toss out every single conviction for perjury ever handed down? Yes, I understand that perjury is lying under very specific circumstances (in court), but it's still a matter of "the government [policing] the line between truth and falsity"

    Now, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has a pretty abysmal track record, being overturned more than any other court, so it's entirely possible - probable, even - that this might be flipped back and the law will be allowed to stand. Personally, I think this whole matter could be handled without criminalization of the act of lying about medals - I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the .gov passing laws against every single instance of people lying for self-aggrandizement...

    The solution is wonderfully simple: Remove all criminal penalties for veterans who enact retribution against someone for wearing medals/uniforms they didn't earn. If Johnny WannaBe wants to put on the Medal of Honor, four Purple Hearts, and a Victorian Cross even though the closest he's ever gotten to a battlefield is crossing the living room during a game of Medal of Honor, power to him. There should be no criminal penalties for acting like a dork. HOWEVER, if some octogenarian veteran who actually watched friends die at Normandy happens to beat Johnny to within an inch of his life for his stolen honor, that vet should get a parade, not jail time.

    Even so, it's hard to imagine the "thought" process that the 9th followed when it ruled that folks could perpetuate fraud sans consequence.

    That is all.

    Link requiring lisinopril brought to us courtesy of stretch. Thanks for pointing this out.

    Don't Mess With Hasidic Diamond Merchants...

    Okay, so I don't know for certain if the gentleman in this story is a Tribe member, but I just had to work a Blues Brothers reference into this post. From good friend and shootin' buddy Brad_in_ma comes this heartwarming dead goblin addition:

    Jewelry Store Owner Shoots Robbery Suspects, 1 Dead
    WILMINGTON -- A jewelry store owner shot two suspects, one fatally, during an attempted robbery in Wilmington Wednesday.
    Oh, sure, it would have been better as a two-fer, but we'll take any addition to the DGC that we can get. The store owner was either really lucky, or really good:
    Four suspects entered the store around 6:20 p.m.

    The store owner was armed, however, and he opened fire, hitting two of the suspects, according to Det. Gus Villanueva of the Los Angeles Police Department.
    Outnumbered four-to-one and he still takes two out. Not bad at all. Something tells me that the other two were in no condition to fight, as they most likely had to bail a trout pond out of their trousers when their plans for an easy score were thwarted by an armed citizen. Oh, yeah, and it was in California, just for the icing on the cake...

    Sometimes the sheep aren't sheep.

    Dead Goblin Count: 59

    That is all.

    Friday Gun Pr0n #177

    Today's gun pr0n is one of the many fine guns that were on display courtesy of Matthew from SWR Manufacturing. This has the distinction, however, of being one of the only guns he brought that wasn't full-auto, or suppressed, or both.

    Itty Bitty

    Yes, that is a Rorbaugh R9, the smallest production 9mm handgun available. It's a recoil-operated, double-action only 9mm with 6+1 capacity that weighs in at 13.5 ounces empty. It's compact size make it a true pocket gun, with a size roughly that of a Seecamp 380 and the weight of a S&W airweight, only in flatgun form. They're rare as hen's teeth (especially in MA) and on the pricey side indeed, but in this case, worth every penny. I wish I'd gotten a chance to run a mag through it - it was one of the only guns Matthew brought that I didn't get a chance to shoot!

    It'd be interesting to put the R9 with +P+ 9mm side-by-side with the Snubbie from Hell™ with .357 Magnum JSP just to see which one kicks harder...

    That is all.

    Thursday, August 19, 2010

    Endarkening...

    SCI-FI sent me this rather disturbing little slideshow on the economy:



    Wow. It looks like the United States has gangrene. A few observations:

    1.MI and southern CA start off purple and go to black very quickly.
    2. Central USA ("flyover country") weathers the economy pretty well.
    3. Pretty much everything east of the Mississippi is black or purple.
    4. Ditto the entire left coast.

    10% unemployment - pretty much uniformly across the USA - isn't a good sign. It's not the end of the world - although it is higher than the Carter years, when inflation hit double digits. It's instructive, again, that the drooling imbecile Chimpy McHitler had unemployment rates all the way up to - oh - 6%. And that was after dealing with the tech bubble implosion that occurred before he took office, back when Boeing was laying off workers 10K at a time...

    Given that Øbama has been in office for a year and a half now, and the Democrats have held the house and Senate for coming up on 4 years, isn't it time to start looking forward, rather than backward? We hear a lot about how this is "Bush's fault", or how the "last administration" did this or that to hurt/kill/slow the economy; wouldn't it be nice to hear what the new - present - administration is going to do to stop that slide? Recrimination and finger pointing don't employ people nor keep banks solvent - and neither does throwing a ton of .gov $$$ at the issue.

    It's time for some actual leadership, and I fear that the Teleprompter Jesus wouldn't know that if it bit him on the ass...

    That is all.

    Gotta Be More To This Story...

    Stretch sent me this mystifying story in e-mail. I can't quite figure out what's going on.

    Fire-breathing bartenders arrested, face 45 years

    Two fire-breathing bartenders face up to 45 years in prison each for performing flaming bar tricks.

    Jimmy's Old Town Tavern owner Jimmy Cirrito said his bartenders have been entertaining his customers -- by juggling bottles of alcohol and spitting out streams of flames using matchbooks and lighters -- for more than a decade and no one's complained. But shortly after midnight on July 24, two of his longtime employees were hauled out of the Herndon bar in handcuffs and charged with three felonies each plus other misdemeanors

    Three felonies with a possible 45 years in jail for flaming shots? Is this for real? I mean, this is what they're charged with:
    Fairfax County fire investigators charged Tegee Rogers, 33, of Herndon, and Justin Fedorchak, 39, of Manassas, with manufacturing an explosive device, setting a fire capable of spreading, and burning or destroying a meeting house. They also were charged with several state fire code misdemeanors.
    For doing flaming shots. That means anyone that has ever downed a shot of Everclear, then lit a cigarette afterwards to impress their date (heh) is guilty of being a terrorist in VA. There has GOT to be more to this story than what's being reported here, there just has to. The bar owner's gotta be nailing the fire chief's wife or something, or maybe he shut off one too many fire captains at closing call...

    First off, maybe it's just my poor understanding of the law, but how can a fire investigator charge anyone with anything? Wouldn't they report to a DA or somesuch who would then do the charging? Secondly, to call this a stretch (no relation) would be an offense to anything with tensile ability - going from a flaming shot to "manufacturing an explosive device" is just about the biggest leap of faith I've ever seen. And "setting a fire capable of spreading"??? Wouldn't that be, oh, EVERY FIRE EVER SET?

    In any case, be careful with your Bacardi 151 in VA, folks...

    That is all.

    Paging Larry Correia...

    Larry... I think we need to put Milo to work on updating this design:


    This is a Chu-Ko-Nu, the Manchurian repeating crossbow. It's a ten-shot crossbow actuated by means of a lever one works to cock the bow, fire it, and drop another bolt into position to be fired again. It was rumored that a rate of fire of one bolt per second could be achieved with a Chu-Ko-Nu.

    So what we need to do, obviously, is update the design a bit. Instead of a 10-bolt hopper on top, we need a detachable magazine-fed design ideally feeding from the side like a Sten or, even better, from the top - like an Owen. Couple this with an small electric motor to cock the hammer and Owen Pitt could kill vampires with ease...


    Speaking of Monster Hunter Nation, Larry's asking for a headcount of who would like an autographed dead tree copy of Monster Hunter: Vendetta. I'm already down for two. If you loved Monster Hunter International (and really, who didn't?), get your dibs in now for an autographed copy of the next book in what we hope will be a long series.

    Monster Hunter Nation: Because vampires don't sparkle, dammit.

    That is all.

    New Leather...

    At the Northeast Bloggershoot, I had a present for Dragon, the proprietor of Dragon Leather Works. It was a "blue gun" for a S&W j-frame snubnosed revolver, the idea that the j-frame is a pretty ubiquitous carry gun and would be a good model to have for future holster-making. I figured it couldn't hurt to have one of the more popular wheelgun models available should he decide to branch out from flatguns into wheelguns, and Dragon didn't disappoint.

    Yesterday this arrived on my doorstep:

    Love that Python

    That, my friends, is one good-lookin' holster. But her beauty is not only skin deep - this is a workin' holster as well. Just look at this construction:

    Tough Stuff

    There's at least a quarter inch of solid leather at the critical junctures where it meets the belt. I tried it on real quick (oh, like I could resist!) and I have got to say this is one winning combination. Because of the small size of the J-frame revolver, even as an OWB this is easy to conceal with even a loose polo shirt. I'll have a full review up early next week with pictures and a more detailed analysis, but so far I'm very impressed.

    I think we have another winner here Dragon!

    That is all.

    Payin' the Bills...

    Folks, I'd like to draw your attention to a new feature here at MArooned. If you'll look over at the right sidebar, right under the "About Me" section, you'll see a new section called "Jay Pays the Bills". Yes, I've decided to embrace my inner capitalist and start taking advertisements here on the blog, and the very first one is for Sportsman's Guide, reproduced here in its entirety to call special attention to the first ad ever here at MArooned:


    Find the best quality Hunting Tree Stand at SportsmansGuide.com

    Do me a favor and go take a look at what they've got to offer. We believe in patronizing our sponsors here at MArooned. If anyone else out there would like to discuss advertising with me, I can be reached via the e-mail in my Profile.

    It's about time the guy in sales got around to selling out...

    That is all.

    Wednesday, August 18, 2010

    [Insert Stunned Silence Here]

    Sent to me in e-mail from PISSED:

    Vineyard buzzes less for Obamas’ second visit
    OAK BLUFFS — Sharky’s Cantina is once again mixing its “Obamarita’’ cocktail, with tastes of the president’s favorite fruits, and the Locker Room on Circuit Avenue has restocked the “I vacationed with Obama’’ T-shirts.

    But as Martha’s Vineyard prepares for the first family’s visit tomorrow — their second summer stay here since President Obama took office — the excitement that marked last summer’s arrival of the fresh-faced commander in chief seems to have ebbed like the tide.

    Okay, nothing shocking here. It's understandable that the Øbama's second visit would have less fanfare than the first. That's perfectly normal and expected. What is NOT normal nor expected - especially from tony Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts - is this:
    “Last year, Obama gave you goose bumps, but I don’t think you’re going to see that this year,’’ said Alex McCluskey, co-owner of the Locker Room, who sold more than 4,000 “I vacationed with Obama’’ T-shirts last year. But so far this year, he said, his hot item is T-shirts of former President Bush asking, “Miss me yet?’’

    [Jay blinks like a mole in the sun]

    WHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTT????????????

    T-shirts with GEORGE W. FREAKING BUSH on them are out-selling Øbama T-shirts? In Massa-freakin'-chusetts? On Martha's Vineyard, the posh island resort with left-leaning celebrity mansions and the Kennedy compound??? Holy turnarounds Batman!

    You've really got to be doing something horrifically wrong to turn vacationing MAholes against you...

    That is all.

    Safety: Doing It Wrong.

    Pub switches to plastic cups after death
    The Lansdowne Street pub where a man was killed by a broken beer glass early Saturday morning will switch to plastic cups and nonglass bottles until a city licensing hearing next month, a practice Boston officials have used elsewhere to reduce injuries from bar fights.
    I've got a better idea. Why don't we start arresting people who start and/or participate in bar fights, prosecute them, and throw them in jail? Attacking someone with a jagged beer bottle is assault with a deadly weapon - that's a felony with a penalty of up to 10 years in jail right there in the state of MA. Start locking these reprobates up - and keeping them in jail - and chances are pretty good these types of assaults will drop way off. Heck, at the very least the worst offenders won't be able to re-offend - because they'll be behind bars.

    This being MA, however, we get England-lite bans on glass bottles and glasses. A freak accident with a thrown glass kills someone and the whole Boston bar scene goes crazy - rather than accepting that, yes, sometimes freak accidents happen, the bar is contorting itself into a pretzel to avoid being sued. If you're going to serve your patrons beer from a can in a plastic cup so you don't have to worry about glass, power to you. Me, if I'm going to a bar scene, I expect a little more than a college frat party, thanks...

    MA: You're more likely to be relegated to plastic sporks and Tupperware cups here.

    That is all.