Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Taking (Away) The Pledge

We've got a local case that's making the rounds of the local news circuits here in MA. A local high school student has been crusading to have the Pledge of Allegiance reinstated in their school, with predictable negative results (in MA).

School Officials in Mass. Town Won't Let Students Recite Pledge of Allegiance
When Sean Harrington entered his freshman year at Arlington High School, he noticed something peculiar: There were no American flags in the classrooms, and no one recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

So Harrington enlisted the aid of his fellow students, and now, three years later, they have succeeded in getting flags installed in the classrooms. But the pledge still will not be recited.

The Arlington, Mass., school committee has rejected the 17-year-old's request to allow students to voluntarily recite the Pledge of Allegiance, because some educators are concerned that it would be hard to find teachers willing to recite it, according to a report in the Arlington Patch.
The Pledge of Allegiance has always bothered me somewhat, at least the concept that we require children to recite it as part of their daily school routine. It smacks of state-run training where the kids are shamed into mindlessly giving their obedience to the state rather than their parents or friends. America the country needs no mandatory assurances from her young students that they will do their best to uphold the high standards of our country. Heck, we'd do lot better requiring our CongressCritters to recite the pledge daily - even hourly...

I've never understood how making grammar school students repeat a 31-word sentence day after day after day is supposed to make them better citizens. This is a case where "Lead by example" is the best way to get one's point across - for us to truly love our country, make it worth loving. Having USSC Justices who actually understand what the US Constitution means, as opposed to what they'd like it to mean, would be a good start - certainly more than five of them...

Besides, I've always been partial to Calvin's version anyways: "I pledge allegiance to Queen Frag, and her mighty state of hysteria."

That is all.

Link sent by reader Dennis, who is apparently vying with PISSED for "articles that raise JayG.'s blood pressure"...

"Why Do You Carry A Gun?"

...because you never know when you're going to need it.

Rally's shooting: Robbery victim speaks out
KSDK -- Two would-be robbers picked the wrong victim yesterday, quickly finding out that he was armed too. The shootout that followed happened in the parking lot of a St. Louis Rally's Restaurant. Now the victim is speaking exclusively to NewsChannel 5 about what happened.

The victim says he doesn't like violence, but he has a gun for protection. And he was glad he had it yesterday, when two men tried to rob him.

Outnumbered two to one and he still managed to give better than he took. Out-freakin'-standing. The powers that be - that would be the President and his feckless administration - would have left our intrepid hero with less-than-adequate means of taking on multiple armed assailants. They've spoken out, repeatedly, against law-abiding citizens carrying firearms for self-protection, claiming the tired old "blood in the streets" trope that has been proven false for so long it's a laughable cliché now.

What would they have? Would they prefer our hero and his passenger (male/female, the story doesn't say) have been left to the "mercy" of two violent criminals? Obviously so, if they would strip the law-abiding (and only the law-abiding) of the best means of protecting themselves. They would rather this man and his companion comply meekly and hope that the criminals don't beat, rape, or kill them than have them shoot back - which has been proven to be the safest way to avoid injury in a confrontation with a goblin.

Me? I don't believe in leaving myself at the mercy of those who would threaten me and mine. I believe in having the best tools possible for the serious business of protecting my life - and the day they perfect the Star Trek phaser that can stun an attacker instantly with no adverse health effects, I'll carry that over a .45 in a heartbeat. Until such time, though, the best tool is what G-d and John Moses Browning perfected in 1911 (insert your favorite here, this is not intended to be a caliber war...) Arm yourself with the best tool for the job. Train with that tool for as many scenarios as you can imagine. Hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst.

And carry your guns, people!

There's only one bad part to this story:
Authorities expect charges on the suspects sometime tomorrow. One of them remains in critical condition, the other is in serious condition.

We could have reached 50 dead goblins if the goblins had any brains to hit...

That is all.

Story sent by brad_in_ma - thanks!

"Stop" Movies...

I forget exactly where/when it came up, but the subject of "STOP" movies came up. These are movies that you have to stop and watch if you happen to be flipping around the dial. Some are classics - movies that transcend time and space in a crescendo of awesome that simply overwhelm the senses and force you to watch, drawn in by the sheer cinematic masterpiece unfolding before you. Others are pure camp; movies so incredibly cheesy and trainwreck bad that you simply can't turn away. Others just reach out and speak to you from the celluloid - maybe it's a movie you saw as a child that has extra meaning; maybe it's a favorite among your clique of friends.

Here are a few of mine:
  • The Blues Brothers
  • Independence Day
  • Rio Bravo
  • Pulp Fiction
  • Fifth Element
  • Unforgiven
  • Christine
  • A Christmas Story (this gets problematic at Christmas time...)
  • Ghostbusters
  • Stripes
  • Monty Python and the Holy Grail
  • Predator
What are the movies that make you put down the remote and watch?

That is all.

Geekarific!

Heh. PISSED sent me this extraordinarily geeky - and really cool - video:




You'll never look at Jabba the Hutt the same way again...


That is all.

Third Annual Northeast Bloggershoot Meet & Shoot Update II

Time draws short as the summer rolls ever on. Tomorrow is July 1st, and there's a bloggershoot right around the corner now. August 1st seemed to work for the vast majority of respondents, so I think we've got a firm date now. It's time to get things ironed out, finalize the guest list, and start thinking about hardware... Original post here, update here.


Onto the specifics...

Date: Sunday, August 1st.

Time: 10:00 AM until our host kicks us out.

Location: Doubletrouble's sooper seekrit range, the location of which is highly classified.

Attendees:

Lissa & Mike
JD & sprog
ZerCool & possibly Mrs. ZerCool
Brad_in_MA
Ross
Mr & Mrs. Mopar
Wally
Weer'd Beard
libertyman (pls bring Mossberg...)
Marko
David
scotaku
Borepatch
TOTWTYTR
Angry Patriot
Andrew & son & friend
drmac & Mrs. drmac

Possible
:
pdb (SRSLY?!?!?!)

That's twenty three definites (not counting our host and your humble scribe) and one possible. That's about what we had last year, which really is about the limit of what the range can hold. If many more want to come, we'll have to divide into shifts or something.

Miscellaneous: Looking at the list, there's only a couple new names there, so most everyone has shot together before. The Four Rules are paramount - proper gun handling etiquette is an absolute must. I will once again be Range Master, and I'll be bringing Mr. Whistle to signal hot/cold range.

This is a "pack-in, pack-out" shoot - be prepared to bring home any bullet-riddled items you bring with you for targets. Additionally, we believe in leaving the range in as good or better condition than when we found it - a half-hour or at the end of the day cleaning up is in order.

Bring bug spray - this is out in the woods - inclement weather gear (we'll shoot in a light rain) is a good idea, as are folding chairs/tables/canopies/etc. along with the boomstickie goodness.

Bringing a lunch would be recommended this year - I think we broke the local sandwich shop with an order for two dozen subs last year... Also remember to bring plenty of water to keep hydrated (hey, I'm a Cubmaster, I gotta pitch for safety here...)



Now comes the fun part: Deciding what toys to bring!

That is all.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

What Did I Do?

Okay. One is happenstance. Two is coincidence. Three different automotive-based forums linking here tells me that something I wrote struck a chord with someone in the automotive world...

I'm seeing incoming links from the following forums:
  • GM Full Size
  • LA (Louisiana) Truck Scene
  • DFW Minis
  • Dayton Mini Trucks
Now, given that there has been a two-month lull in my automotive posts, and that I started the Top Ten list with a list of cars I don't like, the paranoid in me assumes that someone took offense to something I've written. If anyone out there happens to be a member at one of the above forums, could y'all check out and let me know what's going on? I'm happy to get the hits, but if I've offended my motorhead brethren (and sistren), I'd like to know. Alternately, if anyone from any of these forums pops in here, give a shout and let me know what's going on...

At the very least there's gotta be more blogfodder available...

That is all.

UPDATE: Found another one - Dayton Mini Trucks - that's linking the helmet video from earlier. The internet is a wild and wonderful place.

An App for Rage...

Friend, fellow New England Bloggershoot and Blogdinner attendee Mopar sent me the following e-mail about a new app:
Check out http://www.realtimecongress.org/ for apple and android.
Some of the android features (I assume the apple is about the same)

The features:

Read the latest bills, laws, and see what bills were recently voted on.
Find members of Congress by using your phone's location, a zipcode, a last name, or a state.
Read tweets and watch videos from members' Twitter and YouTube accounts.
Reply to a member of Congress on Twitter from within the app, using your own account.
Read the latest news about them, using the Yahoo News API.
I downloaded it, of course, because I'm a masochist, political junkie, and otherwise glutton for punishment. What really got me, though, was Mopar's description of how he uses the app:
Every time I think I might be feeling a little happy I open this app and within a few minutes I'm bad to my normal grumpy self.
I expect I'll use it in much the same manner...

That is all.

Conflicted...

I have conflicting feelings on this story:

Wild chase on Pike ends with rammed cruisers, arrest

FRAMINGHAM — A driver enraged at a request that he turn down his music reportedly tried to run down a man and his grandson in the South End yesterday and then led State Police on a harrowing 20-mile chase on the Massachusetts Turnpike that ended when the suspect rammed police cruisers, spun out of control, and attempted to flee on foot, police said.

“Several cruisers had the suspect’s vehicle boxed in,’’ said State Police spokesman David Procopio. “He barreled through those cruisers, struck several of them, at least three of them, and ultimately spun out.’’

This was all over the morning news this morning, complete with a news helicopter's video of the end of the chase. The suspects car doesn't really *ram* the police cars, just kind of bumps there - but that's a semantic difference; it's still assault with a deadly weapon. We are treated to a wonderful sight of a braindead imbecile getting what's coming to him for not paying attention - as four or five MA State Police cruisers, all with lights ablaze and sirens blaring, run alongside the suspects car, some nitwit in a Buick cruises on past - *just* as they pull the pit maneuver and the Buick winds up part of the wreck. Sorry, thanks for playing, trying explaining THAT one to your insurance company: "Well, see, I was completely oblivious to the high speed chase that happened right next to me"...

The video does show something disturbing towards the end of the chase. There's video at the local news site here - you can see the first officer to make contact just starts swinging. Now, I'm not familiar with the MSP procedures involving taking down someone in this situation, but I find it hard to believe that the first line of action is to start throwing haymakers. That said, if there were anyone on the friggin' planet that deserved a full and complete beatdown, this POS was it. He tried to run over a guy and his grandson for asking him to turn down his stereo and then ran from the cops - because he is an illegal alien and was high on meth at the time...

But because we don't like the actions of a criminal doesn't give the cops the right to administer beatings, no matter how much they deserve it. The law applies to us all, or it applies to none of us. If police officers are justified in beating the hell out of some scumbag who deserves it, who determines exactly how much one has to do to become a "scumbag who deserves it"? To the Paul Helmkes and Roger Eberts of the world, I probably deserve a beating from the cops because I carry a firearm. To the Democrats, anyone at a Tea Party event may be worthy of the full Rodney. I don't want to give the police the power to assault folks based on "someone" arbitrarily "deserving" it.

Look. You throw a punch at a cop, you deserve a full and honest beat-down. You resist the cuffs, expect to be treated as a combatant and have full force used against you. Now, the guy in the video is *not* complying with the officer's demands to get on the ground, that's a point right there. But that cop is just waling on the guy, fists flying, with no apparent attempt to bring him under control, just punishment. He's not trying to get the guy cuffed. He's not taking hits himself; I just don't see how the situation warrants actual punches. If the guy had taken the most feeble of swings I'd be the first one saying "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" - but on the other hand, he kinda did take the first swing by hitting the cruisers.

I'm not comfortable letting the cops off scot-free on this one, but by the same token, that POS really deserved every single hit he took. I don't think the cops should have carte blanche to assault suspects no matter how big of an ass the suspect might be; on the other hand, you try to run someone over with your car, then run from the cops, hitting cruisers along the way and just in general putting folks in jeopardy, you take your lumps. Being an asshole isn't reason enough to justify police brutality; however actions have consequences, and trying to run a cop off the road is going to piss him off - expect a few lumps.

I guess, in the end, it really does come down to "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" after all...

That is all.

Seriously Cool Stuff...

Sent to me by SCI-FI is this extremely cool video of a motorcross helmet being cut from a block of aluminum:



Now, I hope that this is a purely ornamental helmet - I'd hate to think what would happen to that in a crash - but that's still pretty damn impressive...

That is all.

Going Forward...

Okay, so the good guys won in McDonald vs. Chicago. This is a good thing. Folks are wondering what this will mean for other locations - mainly CA, NY, MA, and other gun-unfriendly states - the win in Chicago was a close one, and should have been about as close to a slam dunk as possible. Chicago's total ban on handguns, even more draconian than the DC regulations overturned by the Heller decision, seemed like the perfect place to start the campaign to use the Heller decision to repeal unconstitutional gun laws.

So, naturally, when we hear "unconstitutional gun laws", Massachusetts comes to mind almost immediately. MA has what can be considered the trifecta of onerous gun laws:

1. "Approved Firearms Roster". While technically a "consumer protection act", it's a list of what handguns can - and by exclusion cannot - be sold in Massachusetts.

2. Assault Weapons Ban. Bans semi-automatic rifles based on certain features. Based on the Federal ban that expired six years ago and limits magazine capacity for long arms and handguns.

3. "May issue" permitting. In MA, it is completely up to the whim of the local Chief of Police as to who gets a permit to own a firearm. FID permits - which cover shotguns and low-capacity longarms (10 rounds and under for semi-automatic rifles) - are "shall issue", everything else is "may issue" according to the CoP.

MA is one of only a select few states which require permits simply to own a firearm (NJ, HI and IL are the others); and MA alone is "may issue" for long arms - the other states issue permits for long arms on a "shall issue" basis. MA puts restrictions on what handguns can be owned in the state, specifically what can be sold by dealers. MA also puts restrictions on what types of longarms can be sold. MA imposes felony-level penalties for possession of high capacity magazines.


Looking at the McDonald decision, it's possible that MA could face challenges in all three areas. The permitting aspect is the most formidable one - the entire concept of "may issue" flies in the face of the concept of "the right to keep and bear arms" not being infringed. Giving one person - the local chief of police - absolutely power over who gets a carry permit and who does not - with no accountability whatsoever - is not a system which supports the basic tenets set forth in the Second Amendment. Justice Alito called the right to have a gun in the home a "fundamental" right - it's quite possible that "may issue" as it is practiced in MA may become the lynch pin to overturn the concept of "may issue" entirely, or at least significantly reform it.

In a state such as MA, where a permit is required to simply possess a firearm and the types of firearms one can possess may be arbitrarily and capriciously curtailed based solely on the whim of the local permitting agency, it's quite possible that someone could be denied a permit to own a handgun. This is in direct opposition to the rulings in both Heller and McDonald, where the right to possess a handgun was deemed to be a fundamental right - MA might possibly be the fulcrum to move the "May Issue" states into the "Shall Issue" category. It may take a brave person who is denied their Class A or B LTC (for pistols) to push this aspect, but the benefits would be immense - taking the power to grant a permit, which is really the power to deny a right, away from a person or persons with no accountability is a good first step.

It's hard to see how the "Approved Firearms Roster" will stand, given that CA's "safe gun" list is already coming under fire thanks to the SAF (and go answer Newbius's challenge to join SAF while you're at it). DC adopted CA's list in the wake of Heller, and as a result the need to challenge the CA list becomes doubly important - if/when this is struck down, it's hard to see how MA wouldn't follow suit. It wouldn't be surprising to see MA lose the requirement altogether should CA's "safe gun" list be found to be unconstitutional.

And lastly, the MA assault weapons ban. Once again, it's hard to see how a law banning certain types of weapons simply because they contain a certain amount of a certain type of feature makes any sense whatsoever. This concept has been illustrated before, but in a nutshell, a firearm can be legal or illegal based solely on the presence - or absence - of a single piece of metal. It may fire the same round. It may fire that same round in exactly the same manner. Yet if one iteration has a bayonet lug and the other doesn't, one version is legal while the other is a felony. This is the hardest to see falling, as only affects a certain class of weapons and is simply defeated (pin the stock, grind off the bayonet lug, etc.).


In any case, it will be interesting and instructive to see what kind of challenges come down the gun control pike as a result of McDonald. Personally, I'd like to see MA lose the "May-Issue" aspect most of all - it would be nice to not go into a blind panic every 5 years whe it becomes license renewal time... Losing the AWB would be a close second - I'd love to be able to put a collapsible stock on my Bushmaster, or a folding on my AK-47 clone. Not to mention being able to buy magazines again...

We're making good progress, that's for sure; now's the time to start pushing the issue slowly but firmly...

That is all.

Monday, June 28, 2010

That's Gotta Hurt...

Brown outpolls Kerry, Obama

US Senator Scott Brown, who only months ago was a little-known figure even within the tiny band of Republicans in the state Senate, not only catapulted to national stature with his upset US Senate victory, but is today the most popular officeholder in Massachusetts, according to a Boston Globe poll.


After less than five months in Washington, Brown outpolls such Democratic stalwarts as President Obama and US Senator John F. Kerry in popularity, the poll indicates. He gets high marks not only from Republicans, but even a plurality of Democrats views him favorably.

Heh. Excuse me for a moment while I laugh like a tickled hermit... Scott Brown is more popular than Lurch, "Cadillac" Deval, or Øbama... in Massachusetts. That's gotta be sending some shock waves through the political establishment right there. So far, it's way too early to tell if Brown's going to be able to hang onto the seat he wrestled away from Marcia Coakley when he comes up for re-election in 2012. For now, Scott's ridin' high and has got to be enjoying all the stir he's causing.

Two years is several political lifetimes, especially in the "take-no-prisoners" venue of Massachusetts politics. Time will tell if Brown's election was a simply fluke, a once-in-a-lifetime freak occurrence that won't be repeated or if it was real, honest voter discontent with the Democratic party - in Massachusetts. This upcoming election will be a watershed, that's for certain, in that a sweeping political realignment might frighten the (D)s enough to stop their slide, or they could take a page from the Republicans playbook and think they need to move even further left...

In any case, it's going to be a long, bumpy, and fascinating ride.

That is all.

I'm Lovin' It...

(Sorry, I just had to title my McDonald post that way...)

By now I'm probably one of the last gunbloggers to bring you the good news that the Chicago gun ban has been declared unconstitutional.

Court rules for gun rights, strikes Chicago handgun ban
In another dramatic victory for firearm owners, the Supreme Court has ruled unconstitutional Chicago, Illinois' 28-year-old strict ban on handgun ownership, a potentially far-reaching case over the ability of state and local governments to enforce limits on weapons.

A 5-4 conservative majority of justices on Monday reiterated its two-year-old conclusion the Constitution gives individuals equal or greater power than states on the issue of possession of certain firearms for self-protection.

Damn those conservative judges! Chicago's ban on handguns had been working so well on containing violence in the city, too... While it's excellent that the ban was struck down, once again it's rather frightening to see the vote so close. 5-4 against something so clearly unconstitutional? Four judges cannot even comprehend the concept of "shall not be infringed"? It's pretty amazing that this was even an issue - given how completely and utterly the ban has failed at even making a dent in violence, one would think they would cheerfully give it up in the wake of the Heller decision.

Chris in Texas sent me this link to a PDF of the actual ruling (thanks Chris!). I've just got to post this:

Two years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. ___, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense and struck down a District of Columbia law that banned the possession of handguns in the home. Chicago (hereinafter City) and the village of Oak Park, a Chicago suburb, have laws effectively banning handgun possession by almost all private citizens. After Heller, petitioners filed this federal suit against the City, which was consolidated with two related actions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. They sought a declaration that the ban and several related City ordinances violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. Rejecting petitioners’ argument that the ordinances are unconstitutional, the court noted that the Seventh Circuit previously had upheld the constitutionality of a handgun ban, that Heller had explicitly refrained from opining on whether the Second Amendment applied to the States, and that the court had a duty to follow established Circuit precedent. The Seventh Circuit affirmed, relying on three 19th-century cases—United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, and Miller v. Texas, 153 U. S. 535— which were decided in the wake of this Court’s interpretation of theFourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause in the Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36.

Held: The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.


This is excellent news indeed. Those of us living in (ahem) less-than-2A-friendly states have a ray of hope that our states' oppressive gun laws will be next. Personally, I would love to see MA's Approved Firearms Roster and Assault Weapons Ban thrown on the ash heap of bad legislation; I can only hope that our permitting system will someday be addressed.

Baby steps today, but certainly in the right direction - good news today folks...

That is all.

Off to Camp...

So this morning starts the kids' summer camp. The camp is held at the elementary school they both attend; the folks that run it are mostly school staff they already know, with a mixture of high school and college kids helping out as counselors. This is TheBoy's third year at the camp and BabyGirl G.'s second; they're eligible to go when they are starting first grade (TheBoy's first year of eligibility was when Mrs. G. was part-time second shift). We were nervous that they might protest going to this camp, given that it's at their school and this is summer vacation after all, but they get a kick out of playing video games in the library and eating their lunch in the gym...

Getting all their gear ready last night, we started packing their old school bags with the items they'll need: spare change of clothes, bathing suit, sunscreen, etc. One of the things on the list is a beach towel - they do some water play with sprinklers, etc. and the kids need towels to dry off, right? Well, last year we stuffed one of TheBoy's old bath towels into his bag and didn't think anything of it - this year, he informs us that he cannot have a "Spiderman" towel because the kids all teased him last year because "Spiderman" is for babies. No, I don't know where it comes from...

It was amusing, a little sad, and comical all at the same time. It was obvious that this was a Matter Of Some Significance to TheBoy, as he was quite insistent that he not take the Spiderman towel to summer camp. I extracted the reason ("They made fun of me!") and realized that it was only a matter of time before they outgrew the superhero/kids stuff; I was hoping it would be just a little longer. I guess I'm still coming to grips with the idea that my kids - and their friends - are growing older.

I just didn't think I'd have to worry about him getting teased over a towel quite this soon...

That is all.

Job Opening: One Klansman

Your employer: The Democratic Party.

Robert Byrd, longest-serving member of Congress, dead at 92
Washington(CNN) -- West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd, the self-educated son of a coal miner who became the longest-serving member of Congress, died early Monday at age 92, the senator's office said.

Byrd, a nine-term Democrat, was known as a master of the chamber's often-arcane rules and as the self-proclaimed "champion of the Constitution," a jealous guardian of congressional power.

Further down in the article deifying Byrd, they do actually make mention of his time in the Klan - that he:
blamed "that Southern atmosphere in which I grew up, with all of its prejudices and its feelings," for his opposition to equal rights, which included joining the Ku Klux Klan in the 1940s.
See? It's the South's fault Byrd "joined" the Klan. I wasn't aware that the South caused him to become a Grand Kleagle in the Klan - "Kleagle" being a recruiter paid to bring people into the Klan. He wasn't just some po' boy who joined up because he didn't know what he was getting himself into, or that he got swept up and joined in the heat of the moment. You don't become a recruiter for the KKK by accident.

But you know what? Kennedy left in 2009 and now Byrd in 2010. If this is Øbama's change, then this is change I can believe in... One can only wonder how West Virginia will honor their native son as they lay him to rest: do they bring him back to WV on Robert Byrd Highway? If they divert the funeral procession to cross every Robert Byrd bridge it could take weeks to get him home...

Rest in peace, Senator Byrd - and say hi to Ted Kennedy when you reach your final resting place.

That is all.

Life Is Good Meme...

The Gregarious Loner tagged me in his post Ten reasons. I caught the tail end of the challenge, but a challenge is a challenge nonetheless. Here's the gauntlet he threw down:
Okay.... that's what stands out in life right now Tell me your ten best reasons life is good... I issue it as a challenge.
Ten reasons life is good. This shouldn't be too hard...

1. Children. Watching my kids grow is the most amazing thing I could ever possibly imagine. Right before my very eyes, I'm watching both of them develop their own personalities, their own likes and dislikes, their own styles. I've seen Christmas through the eyes of a child again; experienced the thrill of a roller coaster again; slept out in a tent for the first time in years; all because of my kids. They are the greatest thing to ever happen to me.

2. Friends. Both "in real life" (I hate that term) and online, I am blessed to be able to call some of the greatest people in the world "friend". Some I've known for decades; others I've only met recently; all are just fantastic, wonderful people that I am privileged to simply know. Some have talked me off the figurative ledge; others have patiently listened to me grouse; others have given their time, energy, and, most importantly of all, their friendship in return.

3. Freedom. Despite my near-constant grousing about it, this is still the single greatest country in the entire world. Nowhere on earth are people as free as we are here even today in the USA - we have freedoms we take for granted that others spend their whole lives trying to achieve. Despite her flaws, the United States of America is still Ronald Reagan's shining city on a hill.

4. Technology. I've mentioned before being amazed at the pace of technology. From $500 microwave ovens to VCR->DVD->Blu-Ray -> ??? to computers that fit in the palm of your hand, in my own lifetime I've seen the most amazing display of technological advances. This is truly an amazing time to be alive for the technophile.

5. Information. Never before in human history have we had such amazing methods of gathering information as we do right now. In my pocket I have a device that, when it receives the signal, can access any newspaper in the world, any news channel, any number of analytical resources. We've become so used to instantaneous news that we grow impatient waiting for a five minute update.

6. Guns. I'll be honest here. I just plain like guns. Sure, there's a lot to be said for the firearm being a symbol of freedom; how we carry firearms as the best methods of defending ourselves from two-legged predators, etc.; but really, I just like things that go boom. From the tiniest NAA arms .22 pistol to a Barrett M82, I'm fascinated by the engineering that goes into the manufacture of a firearm. I've got guns that my grandfather shot for many years that still work exactly as intended some 80 years later...

7. Beer. Beer's a funny one. I was never a big fan of beer as a younger man, enduring it simply as a vessel for alcoholic goodness. Now that I'm older and wiser (stop laughing), I've come to appreciate the rich flavor and simple pleasure that is beer - it really is proof that G-d loves us and wants to be happy.

8. Motorcycles. I love being on two wheels, I really do. The wind in my face, the rushing of the landscape, the feeling of raw, unadulterated freedom is simply indescribable to those that don't ride. Yes. Is motorcycle. Is not safe. I understand I'm most likely to get my fool self killed on two wheels than in a car, truck, or airplane. But damn, it's nowhere near as much fun on four wheels...

9. Bacon. Quite possibly nature's perfect food. Many a camping trip has seen bacon as breakfast and lunch (and as a condiment to dinner). The sound of bacon sizzling in a cast iron skillet over a roaring campfire is one of the most enticing sounds on this planet - everyone knows the sound of frying bacon. I think with enough bacon, we could bring about world peace.

10. Coffee. Oh, coffee, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways... Mornings are a wretched ball of suck, that's a given. They would be a far greater wretched ball of suck without coffee, though; the caffeine delivery vector known as coffee makes even the darkest day a little brighter.


Okay. What are your 10 reasons life is good?

That is all.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Can't Wait for Thanksgiving...

...because right now, the thought of a motherf**king turkey getting it's head chopped off sounds pretty damn good...

Turkeys were meant to be a food animal. There's no question about it. Anything stupid enough to meander out into the damn road as a friggin' Harley roars by at about 45 MPH deserves to be eaten. I just came about two feet from having to have a 20-something pound turkey surgically removed from my sternum. Fortunately it just winged (literally) the engine guard and didn't appear to take - or leave - any damage.

Other than the fact that I now need to get to Home Depot to buy a pry bar long enough to get the motorcycle seat out of my ass after that puckering...

That is all.

THIS...

Found at Northeastshooters forum:

Dad Life from Church on the Move on Vimeo.

Yeah. Oh hell yeah.

That is all.

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Interesting Times Indeed

I'll reiterate what I said last month: technology is amazing. I'm blogging from my in-laws' backyard, watching the kids play in the kiddie pool, the grown-ups digesting their burgers and dogs, and the rest of the group remaining inside to enjoy the AC. I'm sitting in a camp chair taking everything in, using a piece of technology that, 30 years ago, would have existed only in science fiction.

I can only imagine what the next 30 years will bring...

That is all.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Party Time!

Family gathering this afternoon. I'm in charge of the grill, so for the next couple hours I'll be puttin' the heat to the meat...

If you don't hear from me by tomorrow, assume a beef coma...

That is all.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Friday, June 25, 2010

Friday Fun Thread: Automotive Abominations!

After a significant hiatus, I've decided it's time to revive the Friday Fun Thread featuring automotive miscellany in Top Ten Form. This week's topic struck me out of the blue as I followed one of the cars listed home from work: Top Ten Cars That Should Not Have Been. Now, the cars on this list are not necessarily bad cars - some are quite well-built and long-lasting - just either poor concepts, poor executions, or plain old bad ideas.

So here's the Top Ten Automotive Abominations:

1. Cadillac Cimarron. Far and away the worst. While the Cimarron was hardly the first instance of "badge engineering", it was the first to take a spectacularly crappy car (Chevy Cavalier) and put a top tier name plate on it with only minor improvements over the low end offering. It felt apart quickly, as low end GMs from the time period were wont to do, cheapened the Cadillac name, and paved the way for every manufacturer out there to slap their top tier badge on a POS and jack up the price.

2. VW GTI four door. Uh, no. Look, the GLI with strikingly similar badging and trim was bad enough, but actually slapping the GTI badge on the four door Golf was a travesty, plain and simple. After some 20+ years of the GTI being VW's "pocket rocket", they change it to nothing more than an add-on package for the Golf. Pathetic.

3. Toyota T-100. What a blown opportunity the T-100 was. In the early 1990s, Toyota decided that they wanted to get into the lucrative light truck market. Their small pickup was selling quickly (despite rotting out before it got off the dealer lot in places that have winter), why not take a slice out of the pie belonging to GM and Ford (this was before Dodge re-styled the Ram and wrestled back a piece of the truck pie). What do they roll out? A small, underpowered truck with excruciatingly bland styling that was smaller than the Dodge Dakota but with less power options. FAIL.

4. Mercury Cougar. The last iteration of the Cougar saw it transmogrify from a twin to the Thunderchicken into a two door escort. The same car that once boasted a 429 Cobra Jet now had a 4-banger. Ugh. It was a toss-up between the Cougar and the Capri for which Merc they screwed up the most, but at least the second iteration of the Capri was a drop-top...

5. Plymouth Prowler. Yet again, another car that should have been great, but wasn't. The Prowler suffered from the success of the Viper - Chrysler took the Viper from concept to showroom floor, absolutely wowed the automotive world, then started believing their own press releases. They rolled out the Prowler - with its aggressive styling and retro-hot rod good looks - mated to a vanilla V6 and a dogamatic transmission. Sales more or less defined lackluster and the car died a quick and painful death.

6. Late 1970s/early 1980s GM diesels. Not the trucks, those were/are excellent performers. In the late 1970s, as a response to the gas crisis experienced earlier in the decade, GM decided that diesel engines were the way to go. Now, had they done it right, we might be driving 50 MPG diesel Impalas today - instead, they did it so horrifically wrong that the American public *still*, some 30+ years later, distrusts diesel engines mightily.

7. Honda Ridgeline. Honda does a lot of things very well. They build solid, dependable automobiles, they have a long reputation for quality manufacturing at reasonable prices, and their cars hold their value very well. What Honda does not do, however, is trucks. A six cylinder, front wheel drive "truck" that costs more than most rear-drive V8s? Err, no. Stick to econoboxes.

8. 2002 Ford Thunderbird. Ford Motor Company really ruined this pair - between turning the aforementioned Cougar into a FWD POS and what they did with the 2002 T-Bird, they killed a very successful marque and nearly brought about the death of the "boutique" automobile entirely. Ford killed the Thunderchicken in the late 1990s, with rumors swirling around of a radical restyle that evoked the original '55 Bird. The car they rolled out looked really nice - and they priced it as though it were a restored 1955 T-bird. Sales were disappointing, to say the least...

9. Dodge Rampage. Whose idea was it to slap a pickup body on the friggin' OMNI??? Someone at Chrysler should have been fired - preferably from a cannon - for even suggesting that they put a pickup body on a 96 HP, FWD car. One can only assume they were aiming at the Subaru Brat or the VW Rabbit pickup, neither of which exactly set the small truck world on fire. The only upside to the Rampage is that it would allow one of the coolest conversions ever - take a Rampage body, put the turbocharged Shelby GLHS motor in it with appropriate 5-speed, add the body cladding, and have a Carroll Shelby-inspired pickup...

10. Cadillac Escalade EXT. No. No no no no no. See the Cimarron entry. You do not slap a top tier badge on a low-end marque, you just don't. Especially when the only trucks ever built before in the entire history of your company were used as flower haulers for funeral homes.


So there's my list of bad automotive ideas through the ages. Once again, if your very favoritest car is on this list, it doesn't mean that the car itself is no good - just that the concept behind it wasn't solid IMHO. There are some very well-built cars on this list (and some stinkers); inclusion on the list for the most part indicates a marketing issue, not an engineering one (except for the GM diesels, although I suspect marketing brought that about as well...)

What automotive atrocities did I miss?

That is all.

You Know the Drill...

If it's Friday, it must be Vicious Circle time...

Vicious Circle number 56 ("Robust Wang" - ask Robb) is up for your listening "enjoyment". Join alan, Robb, Vine, aepilotJim and Kevin Bacon Baker and me as we discuss the problematic US/Mexican border, legal and illegal immigration, the "War" on Drugs, what's happening in the Gulf, more technical difficulties (although not just from me this time), and pretty much anything else that flits across the radar [SQUIRREL] in the 2+ hours we yammer on.

Vicious Circle: Come for the freak, stay for the food!

That is all.

The Terrible Twos...

My number one Blogson hits his second blogiversary today.

It's pretty amazing how things happen in the great wide world web. Two years ago, Borepatch got in touch with me and asked about coming to the bloggershoot, the "first" annual (Bruce will disagree) shoot. He had just started his blog, and wasn't sure if he qualified; of course, I said, everyone's welcome. I started following him then - he was my first blogchild - and have watched his blog grow steadily over the years as he finds his voice and hits his stride.

It's amazing how fast they grow and leave the nest... *sniff* Congrats Borepatch!

That is all.

November Is A Long Ways Off...

Poll suggests Baker-Patrick gap narrows

A new poll shows Republican challenger Charles D. Baker closing the gap on Deval Patrick, the incumbent Democrat, in the race for Massachusetts governor.

In the Rasmussen Reports survey released yesterday, Patrick logged 41 percent, Baker was at 34 percent, and Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill, an independent, was third at 16 percent.

That Baker is within single digits of Patrick bodes well. That it's still some five months until the election, though, renders this point pretty well useless - there's still plenty of time for the GOP to royally screw this one up. What I did find interesting, though, was this:
A Rasmussen poll a month ago had Patrick ahead by 14 points, leading Baker 45 percent to 31 percent, with Cahill third at 14 percent.
Wrap your mind around that for a moment. Baker has cut Patrick's lead in half in a month, and the Globe headline reads that the poll "suggests" Baker is narrowing the gap. At the same time that the independent makes gains, the Republican cuts the Democrat's lead in half. That's more than just a suggestion. That's an outright clue there...

Now, we've got four years to get someone to run against Lurch - or I'm gonna take out papers...

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #169

Weerd beard was kind enough to send me some of the pictures he took at the NRA convention last month. This beauty was in amongst them:

Brought Enough Gun? Yes!

Yes, that is a Barrett M82 I am posing with. It's every bit as heavy as you might imagine, and just as unwieldy... I remember, about a dozen or so years ago one of the night time "news" programs did a hit piece on the Barrett, one of the forerunners to the "ZOMG IT SHOOTS DOWN TEH PLANEZ" that they have now. They pointed out that there was less regulation on the Barrett than on a handgun (well, duh, it's a long arm) and that it was "sought after" for it's "power", leaving the impression that just anyone could walk in off the street and buy one.

They neglected a few simple facts:

  • It's five feet long
  • It weighs over 30 pounds loaded
  • It costs $9K
  • Each round costs $3-$5.
Other than that, the story was right on...

That is all.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Those Wacky Aussies!

2 Men Agreed to Shoot Each Other in the Butt, Need Surgery
Two Australian men required surgery Tuesday after shooting each other in the buttocks as part of a drunken pact to see if it would hurt.

The two friends, both 34, from the Grampians region in Victoria, Australia, decided to undertake the experiment after enjoying a few beers on Sunday evening, Victoria Police said in a statement.

What's the equivalent? "Hey, y'all hold my Fosters and watch this shit"? I'm trying to figure out which of the laws of physics are different in Australia if they actually had to question whether getting shot in the ass with an air rifle pellet would hurt. Is gun. Is not safe. Even air gun. It appears that Julie doesn't know these cretins...

Here's the real knee-slapper:
Police said one of the men will have his firearms license withdrawn and his firearms confiscated.

Ha! Those crazy Australians! Where do they think they are, Massachusetts?

That is all.

Story sent with a chuckle by Brad_in_ma.

Still Furiously Angry...

Remains of 72 people found at World Trade Center site
New York City officials say a renewed search this year of debris in and around the World Trade Center site has recovered 72 human remains.

The sifting of more than 800 cubic yards (612 cubic meters) of debris recovered from ground zero and underneath roads around the lower Manhattan site began in April and ended Friday.
I'm glad that 72 more families will finally have closure. It's pretty eerie, realizing that they're still finding victims almost nine years later. How many countless dozens - or hundreds - will never been found? How many will never be identified? What does it say about the magnitude of the attack that it's taken this long to find these victims?

And it's especially telling that they're using terms like "remains" and "ground zero" (as opposed to "Ground Zero") in these reports - the vast majority have forgotten the horror of that day.

That is all.

Link sent by PISSED.

MA: Where the Rubber Meets the Swingset...

Mass. school district under fire for condom policy
PROVINCETOWN, Mass. — A new policy in a Massachusetts public school district that makes condoms available to all students, even those in elementary school, is drawing criticism from some who say it goes too far.

Provincetown School Board Chairman Peter Grosso says because there is no set age when sexual activity starts, the committee decided not to set an age for condom availability.

What I find especially interesting is that I need to write a note to have my 9 year old bring Children's Tylenol to school if he has a headache, yet he can go right to the school nurse and get a condom without so much as a call to mom & dad. Given that most elementary schools only go to fifth or sixth grade, where kids are 10 - 12 at the oldest, it's puzzling why the Provincetown School Board felt the need to include elementary schools in the free condom distribution. These are kids that, by and large, are below the age of puberty in all but the most advanced cases, and have no biological need for birth control.

Of course, this has nothing to do with biology. It's all about the school district deciding - in its all-knowing and all-powerful fashion - that it knows better than mom and dad and will handle the kids' upbringing as they see fit. They're imposing their laissez-faire attitude towards sex - the "kids are going to do it anyways" claptrap - on kids as young as 6 or 7 in the interest of, well, I can't figure it out. I honestly don't know what they think they're doing here other than making a big splash in the news - the small minority of sexually active grammar school school kids who actually *need* condoms has got to be so far outside the bell curve as to be statistically zero.

But it makes good headlines - shakes up those MA puritans, don't you know. The blue bloods will cluck their tongues and make disapproving noises, while the edgy hipsters will flock to the town for daring to stand up against the evil oppressive patriarchy that keeps sexual freedom under lock and key. But then, hey, what do I know? I'm only the dad of two elementary school kids who obviously wants to control his kids' bodies by denying them access to birth control. Should their school decide to follow suit, I'll be the first one there to raise holy hell (and quite possibly starting a torch-and-pitchfork concession stand).

And I'd question the parenting skill of any parent who didn't want to have some modicum of control over their grammar school aged children...

That is all.

Hopin' For Change...

McChrystal Relieved of Duty; Petraeus Tapped
President Barack Obama ousted Gen. Stanley McChrystal as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan on Wednesday, choosing the embattled general's direct boss - Gen. David Petraeus to take over the troubled 9-year-old war.

Speaking in the Rose Garden, Mr. Obama said that he accepted McChrystal's resignation "with considerable regret but also with certainty that it is the right thing for our mission in Afghanistan."

He said McChrystal's biting comments about the president and other officials in a magazine article did not meet the standards of conduct for a commanding general.
This is actually something upon which I agree with President Øbama. I had a good friend growing up who went on to join the armed forces out of college - he went through the ROTC program, and right into a commission in the Army. After he had been commissioned, I asked him what he thought about (then) newly minted President Clinton, and he refused to comment. "He's my Commander-in-Chief, no matter what I think of the man personally; I can't criticize him." Even in a private conversation with a personal friend, he wouldn't break that oath, and I respected him greatly for it (even if I did think - and still do - that Clinton deserved all the scorn and then some I could muster...)

Having said that, I think it's hysterical that Øbama replaced McChrystal with Petraeus. Isn't Petraeus the one that was mockingly called "Betrayus" by Move-On (who have conveniently taken down that ad BTW)? Didn't some call him a "war criminal"? He's even been protested at campus speeches. This is the person Øbama chooses to replace McChrystal? Someone with these kinds of ties to the previous administration, what with the waterboarding, Abu Ghraib, and panties-on-heads atrocities?

Now, Petraeus makes excellent sense (which is why I suspect Øbama's motives here). Petraeus engineered the plans that McChrystal was implementing in Afghanistan, so it's quite logical that he get the nod. In a move uncharacteristic of the administration so far, they made the right decision for a replacement of a military officer in a troubled theater. Because of who it is making the replacements, I can't help but wonder if this is a blind squirrel/nut thing, or something more deep-rooted. It is interesting that disparaging remarks about Petraeus are disappearing down the memory hole - Winston Smith, call your office.

I gotta ask, though - is this the hope, or the change we were promised from Barack Øbama?

That is all.

How Do We Un-Amend?

I mentioned the Hughes Amendment in last Thursday's Vicious Circle, and got an e-mail from The Packetman about it:
Listening to the last VC (Fatwas from atheists), I heard you mention he Hughes amendment. Now, like you, I'm by no means a scholar about thee things, but it was my understanding that the Hughes amendment was a sop to other anti-gun congress critters to help them to vote for the underlying bill.

But I've been wrong before!
Well, that got me to thinkin'... (and we all know how dangerous that can be)... I had the impression that the Hughes Amendment was added as an attempt to kill the 1986 Firearms Owners Protection Act (hereby abbreviated FOPA) - whereas it was actually an addition to the FOPA to help it pass. Here's the entirety of the Hughes Amendment:
An amendment to make it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun except in the case of a machinegun that was lawfully possessed before the date of enactment.
One sentence. Thirty one words. And with its passage, the price of automatic firearms skyrocketed as the supply became a fixed commodity. "Transferable" full-auto firearms - meaning firearms made before 1986 - sell for anywhere from $3,000 for an Ingram M-11 to upwards of $25K for a Thompson submachine gun. Other more exotic Class IIIs like belt-feds and chain guns can sell well into the six figures. Transferable M-16s sell for roughly $10K - whereas new select-fire rifles sell for $1200 - $1500 - to law enforcement only. Think about that - the "patrol rifle" that many big city police departments use for special forces costs nearly an order of magnitude less than what you or I can purchase - and is new, as opposed to 24 years old or older.

This is absolutely contrary to the spirit of the Second Amendment.

Before the Hughes Amendment, all that was needed to own a fully automatic weapon was an extra $200. That $1500 brand new Colt select-fire M16 would cost me $1700, rather than $10K and 24 years of wear on it if it weren't for the Hughes Amendment. With a fixed supply, prices will continue to climb, pushing most fully automatic firearms outside the price range of the vast majority of gun owners. Sure, I might scrape together $4K for an M-11 someday, but that's hardly an effective use of my discretionary income. An M16 currently sells for around $13K - how many people can afford what is essentially a good used car for a firearm?

This is absolutely contrary to the spirit of the Second Amendment.

Our Founding Fathers were leery of a professional standing army. They had seen the tyranny that could be wrought with soldiers bought and paid for by the ruling class, and wanted to make sure that all Americans had the means by which to resist should the unthinkable happen and the standing army need to be overthrown. They deliberately hamstrung the government from restricting the right to bear arms - all arms, not just the politically correct ones - so that there would always be the "safety valve" of the Second Amendment. They wanted, more than anything, to make sure that the day the government has a monopoly on force never came.

Putting the same weapon that our soldiers use in theaters around the world out of the price range of the average citizen is exactly the sort of thing that the Second Amendment was supposed to inhibit. Thomas Jefferson laid forth his thoughts on the matter rather succinctly: "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms". GunCite lists a plethora of quotes from the Founding Fathers on guns, gun control, and other forms of governmental oppression - one thing is crystal clear - they wanted us to own firearms, and they wanted the government to be unable to prevent us from owning firearms.

Limiting the supply of military-grade weaponry, while driving the price of comparable hardware beyond the reach of most citizens, runs completely contrary to what they intended. The Hughes Amendment in one sentence unmade two centuries of rough parity. While the 1934 Federal Firearms Act did limit the availability to owning a military grade weapon, the Hughes Amendment moved them almost completely off the table. And as time goes on, and as machines break down - and become more and more valuable - fewer and fewer legal machine guns will be available at any price.

So the question becomes - how do we un-do the damage wrought by the Hughes Amendment? With the advances we've seen in military hardware in the past 24 years, the gulf between the firearms that the military possesses and what the average citizen can own (prisoners behind the red curtains of MA/CA/NJ/NY/etc. notwithstanding) grows ever wider. As gun control advocates so smugly point out, a true shooting war between the armed forces and the average citizen would be lopsided indeed (leaving aside many logistical points, of course). To the freedom-loving American, that should be a screaming neon flag - if the gulf is widening between the professional army and the true militia (all able-bodied persons between the age of 18 and 45), we should be working to close that gulf, not expand it.

Yet for the past 75 years or more we've been actively working to make it harder to own firearms. The Federal Firearms Act of 1934 put stringent regulations on whole classes of arms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 put more restrictions on gun ownership, forbade importation of certain arms, and banned mail-ordering. The Brady Bill of 1994 brought us waiting periods and background checks. We've seen gun rights take hit after hit after hit, and only in the past 20 or so years have we begun to see a change for the better. Concealed carry has gotten more prevalent across the nation, with more and more states allowing concealed carry. We even have a first: more states do not require a permit to carry a concealed firearm than forbid concealed carry entirely. Things are getting better, indeed; but they could be better still.

It's time we started taking back more of our Second Amendment freedoms.

That is all.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Big Brass Ones...

Spirit Airline has 'em. So does the advertising firm they hired...

New Spirit Airlines Ad Makes Light of BP Oil Spill
Only days after having resolved a pilot strike, low-cost carrier Spirit Airlines unveiled today an ill-considered promotion advertising discounted fares to certain beach destinations that appears to make light of the Gulf oil spill.

The online slideshow ad, which is still up on the airline's homepage, begins with the slogan "Check Out The Oil On Our Beaches" written on the screen and then flips through slides of bikini-clad women supposedly on the beaches of Cancun, San Juan,
Atlantic City and Ft. Lauderdale.


There's even a screenshot at the link. I don't know what to make about this. On the one hand, from a human interest perspective this is in shockingly bad taste. Thousands of gallons of oil are spilling into the gulf every day, and having a devastating impact on both marine life and the local economies there. On the other hand, it's a simply brilliant piece of marketing - it's a stupid campaign by itself, but the brou-haha generated is certain to give Spirit Airlines the high-profile exposure they were looking for.

In any case, it's a pretty gutsy decision to run with this ad...

That is all.

Leaps and Bounds...

A reader who wishes to remain anonymous sent me this righteous story from Iowa:

Police: Waterloo store clerk killed 2 robbery suspects

WATERLOO - Two men were shot and killed while apparently trying to rob the East Fourth Street Liquor Store, 1027 E. Fourth St., early this morning.

Robert Maurice Bolden, 21, of Waterloo, died at the scene of the shooting. Antonio McNeal Sproles, 21, of Waterloo, died a short time later at Allen Hospital.

This is a special one - a twofer! You know, there's just something about hearing about a 65 year old store clerk taking on two twenty-something robbers armed with guns and coming out the victor. One has to wonder what would have happened had the clerk not had has gun - maybe the two choirboys would have taken everything in the register and left; maybe they would have shot him down first.

Here's another angle to this story:

Shooting was in the cards

Money quote:
The weapon used by the clerk is a .44 caliber revolver that is kept at the store for protection. This certainly seems to be a case of a citizen trying to protect his life, not the act of a vigilante. We also believe these types of situations reinforce the stance that law-abiding and qualifying citizens have the right to keep firearms for their protection and self-defense.
Wow. Just wow.

This write-up was brought to my attention by FarmDad in GBC chat last night.

In any case, we'll never know what the two goblins intended to do - but we do know that their license to goblin is now expired.

Dead Goblin Count: 48

That is all.

Break, Give Me A...

Group will sue McDonald’s over Happy Meal toys
WASHINGTON — Are the toys in your child’s Happy Meal making him fat?

The Center for Science in the Public Interest says they are. The Washington-based consumer advocacy group threatened to file a lawsuit against McDonald’s today, charging that the fast food chain "unfairly and deceptively" markets the toys to children.

"McDonald’s marketing has the effect of conscripting America’s children into an unpaid drone army of word-of-mouth marketers, causing them to nag their parents to bring them to McDonald’s," CSPI’s Stephen Gardner wrote to the heads of the chain in a letter announcing the lawsuit.

Okay. There is so much wrong with the above that I am having a hard time figuring out where to start. Let's start with the obvious: McDonald's offering a toy in their Happy Meals is not making any child fat. McDonald's Happy Meals are not making any child fat. Parents that allow their kids to eat McDonald's Happy Meals too often are allowing their children to get fat. Blaming McDonalds for this is like blaming Ford Motor Company for drunk driving deaths.

If your child is eating at McDonald's often enough to become obese from it, the problem is not with McDonald's. The problem is you're failing as a parent to provide your child with healthy food options or getting enough exercise, or a combination of both. My kids eat at McDonald's as a treat maybe once a month or so, and guess what? Neither is obese. Heck, we have trouble keeping meat on TheBoy's bones. Growing kids can eat pretty much whatever they want - as long as they're allowed to be kids and run around and play whenever possible.

Using this group's "logic", should we be suing Nintendo because the Wii makes kids want to stay inside on the couch?

If anyone out there honestly thinks that McDonald's food is healthy, well, little I can say here will here them. Suing McDonald's over a plastic toy isn't going to magically absolve folks from having to commit acts of parenting - kids are going to want fat and grease in their food regardless of the cheap POS lead-coated trinket included therein. If you are of the sort that feeds your kid a doublecheeseburger and large fries every night for dinner, whether McD's offers a free Webkinz toy or a broccoli stalk ain't gonna make a lick of difference in whether your kid porks up or not.

It's all up to you as the parent to make wise, healthy choices for your kids. They're going to chose the fatty, fried, chocolate-covered option every single time - you need to be the responsible baddy who says, "No, you can't have macaroni and cheese for the fourth night this week". You need to say and do unpopular things sometimes as a parent if you want your kids to grow up healthy, safe, and smart. If you want to be their BFF and allow them to eat whatever they want, don't be surprised when they balloon up, and don't expect McDonald's to pay for the liposuction.

Actions have consequences no matter how hard we would wish them away.

That is all.

Headline of the Day...

Limo on fire pulls into Saugus gas station
SAUGUS, Mass. -- A limo driver almost made a "catastrophic" mistake when he recently pulled his burning limo over in a soon-to-be-opened gas station.

"It’s right top to the tanks, and the tanks (are) under the ground," said Gerard Male, the new gas station owner.

I'm still trying to figure out what this driver's thought process looks like. "Hmm. My car's on fire. Where can I find a large quantity of flammable liquid to park near?". I'm sure it was the first available open lot, but you'd like to think that someone with the common sense of a limp dishrag would think to travel the extra 100 feet to the next parking lot. There's not a lot of places on Route 1 in Saugus where you don't have giant tanks of gasoline in the same parking lot...

I loved this line:
Fire officials advise drivers in burning cars to never pull into a gas station.
I'd say that's words to live by.

That is all.

Story sent by PISSED, who knows I appreciate a good headline when I see one...

Quack...

So yesterday I took the day off from work and went into Boston with my family. My wife's aunt and cousins are visiting from CA, so she took the week off and along with her mom planned some activities, and yesterday's activity was going into Boston and going on one of the Duck Tours. Basically, it's a group that has a bunch of restored WWII DUKW amphibious vehicles that they use to give tours of Boston from both land and sea.

The land tour is pretty routine - you see all of the Boston landmarks, from the Bunker Hill Monument to the Old North Church to the Bull & Finch pub. Our "ConDUCKtour" was exemplary - he really put a lot of himself into the tour, and made it just that much better. He combined history, humor, and road rage all in one concise tour, keeping us informed, entertained, and even slightly nervous - those DUKWs are big vehicles and Boston streets are not, as a rule, meant for amphibious military craft...

The water tour was much shorter than the land tour, but still a lot of fun. Here's what a DUKW looks like under sail:

Hubcaps Aweigh!

Yes, that's the South Bay House of Corrections in the background... That's obviously not our DUKW - ours was blue - but they're all the same in the water, really. It handled pretty much like you'd expect a sea-going 6½ ton GMC cab-over to handle in the water, but given that we only spent about 20 minutes at sea, it wasn't too bad...

Here were the two highlights of the entire tour:

Cap'n TheBoy

Privateer BabyGirl G.

When they get the boat out on the water, the driver opens up the helm (driver's seat) to any and all who would like to take a turn steering a DUKW. There was enough time on our voyage for all of the kids to have a turn at the tiller, and as you can see from the look on TheBoy and BabyGirl G.'s faces, they had a blast.

Actually, we all had a blast - all anyone could talk about the rest of the day is how much fun we had on the tour. Neither I nor my wife had ever been before (nor either child), so this was a true G. family first, and one I'd be happy to repeat. I wish we'd had more time on the water - it would have been great to get some pictures of Old Ironsides from the water - but the tour's only 80 minutes long.

The Boston Duck Tour is money well-spent IMHO, and that's glowing praise from a cheap SOB like me...

That is all.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

End of an Era...

Last Lakota code talker Clarence Wolf Guts dies at 86

When the towers of the World Trade Center fell on Sept. 11, 2001, Clarence Wolf Guts asked his son to call the U.S. Department of Defense to see if the country needed his code talking abilities to find Osama Bin Laden.

Wolf Guts was in his late 70s at the time, so his son, Don Doyle, did not make the call, but said the request personified his father's love of country.

The story of the Code Talkers is an amazing one. Code talkers participated in every campaign in the Pacific from 1942 until the end of the war, sending and receiving messages vital to the war effort that the Axis were never able to crack. The complex Navajo language proved too difficult for the best codebreakers the Germans and Japanese put to the task of breaking it, and the Code Talkers proved so valuable that they were used well through the Cold War. Only in the past couple of decades have they started to receive the recognition they deserve.

Happy hunting, Wolf Guts.

That is all.

Link sent by brad_in_ma - thanks Brad!

Just for Unix-Jedi...

PISSED sent me the following link:

What Happens When You Auto-Tune a Vuvuzela? Geekosystem Investigates
A vuvuzela is a long, plastic horn that soccer fans blow into to produce a loud, irritating buzzing noise; they have inexplicably become the Internet’s central obsession in the opening week of the 2010 World Cup. Auto-Tune is a pioneering pitch correction program by Antares Audio Technology, which you most likely associate with the robotic vocal stylings of T-Pain and other pop music icons. But you knew all that. What happens when you Auto-Tune a vuvuzela?
Go click on the first file in the link - if you dare...

That is all.

Boston Day Trip Blogging

Taking the family into Boston for the day with our out-of-town guests. We're doing the Duck Tours, then the Museum of Science. We'll follow up with a tour of Quincy Market and Boston Common, then a family dinner. I'm checking out this new Blogpress app suggested by Breda, which should theoretically allow me to post pictures on the fly as well...

This assumes, of course, that we ever make it *in* to Boston... (there's a reason I don't work "in town"...)

That is all

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Play Stupid Games, Add to the DGC...

Via FarmDad in Gunblogger Conspiracy chat comes this uplifting tale of victim FAIL:

Colorado Springs man shoots, kills intruder

COLORADO SPRINGS — Colorado Springs police say one man is dead and another has been arrested after a homeowner exchanged gunfire with two intruders.

Police said two men kicked in the door of a house Saturday and that the homeowner fired at them. Officers said the homeowner told them at least one of the intruders fired back at him as they were fleeing.

Sometimes it's acceptable to shoot someone in the back. Like if they happen to still be shooting at you. So far, though, this doesn't sound like a dead goblin, right?

Wrong:
Police said the intruders later walked into a hospital, one of them with gunshot wounds. Authorities said the wounded man died and the other man was arrested on suspicion of burglary.
That's what you call an occupational hazard right there. You make it your business to kick in people's doors with the intent of stealing their stuff (or worse), you're liable to run into the business end of a 12 gauge. Not every person is a sheep, nor, thankfully, does everyone heed the advice of the so-called "authorities" about not resisting.

Dead Goblin Count: 46.

That is all.

Fascinating!

SCI-FI hipped me to this intriguing link from Forbes.com:

Map: Where Americans Are Moving
More than 10 million Americans moved from one county to another during 2008. The map below visualizes those moves. Click on any county to see comings and goings: black lines indicate net inward movement, red lines net outward movement.
The map itself is interactive - you can go click on any county in any state. Here's just one county in eastern Massachusetts:

Mass Exodus

Looks like I'm not the only one planning on getting the hell out of Massachusetts, eh?

That is all.

Monday, June 21, 2010

"Christ, You Fat Penguin"

Huh?

Vatican calls ‘Blues Brothers’ a ‘Catholic classic’

TAORMINA, Sicily — When Jake and Elwood Blues, the protagonists in John Landis' cult classic “The Blues Brothers,” claimed they were on a mission from God, the Catholic Church apparently took them at their word.

On the 30th anniversary of the film's release, “L'Osservatore Romano,” the Vatican's official newspaper, called the film a “Catholic classic” and said it should be recommended viewing for Catholics everywhere.

[blinks like a mole in the sun]

This is "The Blues Brothers" we're talking about, right? The same movie where Jake and Elwood are repeated pummeled by Sister Mary Stigmata for their "filthy mouths and bad attitudes"??? A Catholic classic? I mean, yeah, I grok that the Blues Brothers themselves are "Cath-o-licks" and are perpetrating their citywide run of destruction and devastation on a "mission from God", but I have trouble putting it up next to films like "The Ten Commandments" or even "The Passion of the Christ" as church faves...

It just goes to show one thing: The power of the Blues is strong indeed...

That is all.

Link sent via e-mail from SCI-FI, as found at Hot Air.

This Is How It *Should* Be...

The Big Guy sent me this heartwarming story out of Florida. I think I may have to work on the Mrs. a little more about movin' down south...

Brazen home-invasion robberies stir Jupiter Farms residents to action
JUPITER FARMS — A trio of would-be robbers who shuffled up a front yard on Alexander Run with a pump-action shotgun last week had the misfortune of confronting an armed homeowner in the driveway. He stared them down until they ran off.

But if they had tried one of the neighbors instead in the rural Jupiter Farms enclave, they might not have had much better luck. In the house next door lives a Vietnam veteran with heavy firepower in his bedroom. At the two houses across the street, the homeowners were packing heat too.

Okay, silly expression ("packing heat"? Newsie, please...) aside, this is a pretty good story. Read the whole thing - there's only the faintest hint of PSH in the entire article (the part about "vigilantes" - again, newsie, please - people defending themselves against armed robbers are not vigilantes!). One can only imagine the tone had this been published in the Globe ("ZOMG! EVIL RETHUGLICANS WANT TO KILL PEOPLE OF COLOR!, IMMIGRANTS"). The tone is not openly hostile to folks owning guns, which is refreshing in and of itself.

What bothers me most (and this has little to do with the article other than having been mentioned) is the whole concept of the "Castle Doctrine". The idea that we need to have laws passed saying that if you kill someone who has invaded your house it's not a prosecutable offense is, quite frankly, offensive to me. We should not need a law affirming a basic human right - the right to be safe from molestation in what should be the safest of sanctuaries, our own homes. This goes hand-in-hand with the abhorrent idea of a "duty to retreat" - eff you, someone threatens me or mine, I shouldn't have to do anything other than front sight, press...

We're making strides in the 2A battle, and that's a good thing. We're dragging guns and gun ownership back into the mainstream after decades of being hidden away in the back of the closet, and more and more people are starting to get into the shooting sports, concealed carry, and home defense arenas. Guns are less of a stigma now than pretty much at any point in my memory, albeit with certain (liberal) pockets of exception (mainly CA, IL, and Northeast). While it's good to see the second amendment brought back from the abyss, maybe it's time to want more...

Maybe it's time we broadened the fight to self-defense in general...

That is all.

If It's For Free, It's For Me!

M.D. Creekmore has a great giveaway for a case of 9mm ammo courtesy of Lucky Gunner ammo:
M.D. Creekmore at The Survivalist Blog – a survival blog dedicated to helping others prepare for and survive disaster – with articles on bug out bag contents, survival knife choices and a wealth of other survival information is giving away a 1,000 round case of 9mm – 124 Grain FMJ (a $200 value – donated by LuckyGunner)! To enter, you just have to post about it on your blog. This is my entry. Visit The Survivalist Blog for the details.
Consider MArooned in...

That is all.

Summer's Here!

Today's the official start of summer, at least according to the calendar (we've had a bout of decidedly un-summery weather recently). But the real start of summer happened over the weekend:

Summer Look

The short windshield means it's summah time...

That is all.

Help Needed...

Got an e-mail the other day looking for a little help:
Given your vast collection of goodie's and inside trade information,I was wondering if you could supply me with some information that seems hard to find. I make custom muzzle brake's for rifle's and anything else,but I have a hard time finding the barrel diameter's or thread info. I'd be happy to send you prototype's in exchange for the information.

Dean in AZ
Does anyone out there in the wide world of sports know of any source or sources for this sort of information? I would assume that the greatest interest would be for AR-15 style rifles and perhaps the modern sniper variants (Rem 700, etc.); do the major manufacturers often publish thread information? Like I told Dean in my response, most of my rifles are either milsurps, rimfire, or permanently welded to comply with the MA AWB {spit}; I guess if there were a cool brake for my Mossberg that would be neat (like the "Roadblocker" brake)...

Any and all information for Dean would be greatly appreciated.

That is all.